Logan v. Patrick

Decision Date01 February 1809
Citation3 L.Ed. 103,9 U.S. 288,5 Cranch 288
PartiesLOGAN v. PATRICK
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

THIS was a case certified from the circuit court for the 7th circuit and district of Kentucky, in which the judges below differed in opinion upon the following questions:

Whether the complainant, (Logan,) who is a citizen of the state of Kentucky, and is so stated in the pleadings, can maintain this suit, in this court, against the defendant, who is a citizen and inhabitant of the state of Virginia, and is so stated in the pleadings, upon the following case: John Patrick obtained in this court a judgment in ejectment against David Logan, who filed a bill in equity against him to be relieved against the judgment, and to compel a conveyance of the land, and obtained an injunction to stay proceedings on the judgment; but the subpoena was not served in the district of Kentucky. Can this court entertain jurisdiction of the cause? If not, does the defendant's answering the bill, without insisting upon the objection that the process was not served upon him in the district of Kentucky, authorize the court to entertain the cause?

THE COURT, upon the first opening of the case, said there could be no doubt of the jurisdiction of the court below, and ordered it to be certified accordingly.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Glass Co v. Co
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 12, 1944
    ...U.S. 82, 42 S.Ct. 196, 66 L.Ed. 475; Jackson v. Irving Trust Co., 311 U.S. 494, 499, 61 S.Ct. 326, 328, 85 L.Ed. 297. 17 Logan v. Patrick, 5 Cranch 288, 3 L.Ed. 103; Marine Ins. Co. v. Hodgson, 7 Cranch 332, 3 L.Ed. 362; Dunn v. Clarke, 8 Pet. 1, 8 L.Ed. 845; Truly v. Wanzer, 5 How. 141, 12......
  • Hadden v. RUMSEY PRODUCTS INC.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • March 21, 1951
    ...Hartford-Empire Co., D. C., 73 F.Supp. 979, 982; Simon v. Southern Railway Co., 236 U.S. 115, 35 S.Ct. 255, 59 L.Ed. 492; Logan v. Patrick, 5 Cranch 288, 3 L.Ed. 103. The attack here by the defendants is not against the judgment itself but against the plaintiff for fraud in obtaining the ju......
  • United States v. Hartford-Empire Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Delaware
    • October 9, 1947
    ...This has been the dominant theme of legislation for the past fifty years; it has been judicial pronouncement since Logan v. Patrick, 5 Cranch 288, 3 L.Ed. 103. As stated in Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 259, 64 S.Ct. 997, 1008, 88 L.Ed. 1250: "Equity also, on o......
  • Helton v. Miller
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • August 23, 1860
    ...Consent, by those authorized to consent, is always sufficient to give jurisdiction of the person, unless some statute forbids it. Logan v. Patrick, 5 Cranch 288.--S. Cond. R. 259.--Gracie v. Palmer, 8 Wheat. 605.--S. C., Cond. R. 561.--Paulding v. The Hudson Mfg. Co., 2 E. D. Smith, 38 A Ci......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT