Loggins v. Thomas, et al.

Docket Number09-13267
Decision Date07 September 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
140 cases
  • Dickey v. Davis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • September 12, 2019
    ...451 n.3 (2005) (an application for habeas corpus may be denied on the merits even if unexhausted in state court); Loggins v. Thomas, 654 F.3d 1204, 1215 (11th Cir. 2011) (relief may be denied on the merits where petition is clearly not meritorious despite asserted procedural bar).6VI. PRELI......
  • Dickey v. Davis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • January 13, 2017
    ...881 (2005) (an application for habeas corpus may be denied on the merits even if unexhausted in state court); Loggins v. Thomas , 654 F.3d 1204, 1215 (11th Cir. 2011) (relief may be denied on the merits where petition is clearly not meritorious despite asserted procedural bar).VI. MOTION TO......
  • Bolin v. Chappell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • June 9, 2016
    ...451 n.3 (2005) (an application for habeas corpus may be denied on the merits even if unexhausted in state court); Logginsv. Thomas, 654 F.3d 1204, 1215 (11th Cir. 2011) (relief may be denied on the merits where petition is clearly not meritorious despite asserted procedural bar).VI. LIMITED......
  • Taylor v. Dunn
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Alabama
    • January 25, 2018
    ...is difficult to meet, that is because it was meant to be." Holsey, 694 F.3d at 1257 (citation omitted); see also Loggins v. Thomas, 654 F.3d 1204, 1220 (11th Cir. 2011) ("[T]he deference due is heavy and purposely presents a daunting hurdle for a habeas petitioner to clear.").5 "Section 225......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Class Actions
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 68-4, June 2017
    • Invalid date
    ...at 1261. 135. Id. at 1258-59.136. Id. at 1259.137. 654 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2011).138. Collado, 820 F.3d at 1259.139. Id.140. Krinsk, 654 F.3d at 1204.141. Collado, 820 F.3d at 1260.142. Id. at 1261.143. 835 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2016).144. The court also refused to enforce a purported arbit......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT