Long v. Cochran

CourtGeorgia Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtSMITH; All the Justices concur, except JORDAN; MARSHALL
CitationLong v. Cochran, 277 S.E.2d 25, 247 Ga. 483 (Ga. 1981)
Decision Date15 April 1981
Docket NumberNo. 37289,37289
PartiesLONG v. COCHRAN, Admr.

Greg McCoy, Pechin, McCoy & Sparks, Forest Park, for Patsy Ann Harris long.

William P. Walker, Jr., Roswell, for Adele Harris Cochran, Admr.

SMITH, Justice.

Appellee is the administratrix of the estate of Jessie Adams Harris. On January 2, 1979, the Probate Court of Fulton County granted appellee leave to sell certain real estate. Appellant brought this action, asserting "an equitable claim for title to the property." She prayed "that title to the property ... be declared in the Plaintiff" and "that the Court issue an interlocutory (and permanent) injunction prohibiting Defendant from selling the property." Appellee filed a counterclaim containing the following prayer for relief: "(a) That the title to the property ... be decreed in the heirs at law of the deceased; (b) That Defendant as Administratrix have and recover possession of the property; (c) That any restraining order issued be dissolved; (d) That the Defendant be allowed to proceed to sell said property at Public Sale in order to make a distribution to the heirs at law; (e) That the Plaintiff pay all court costs of this action and whatever probate costs that are incurred by the Defendant as a result of the Plaintiff's wrongful restraint of the sale of the property ..."

On September 30, 1980, the trial court entered the following order: "The above-styled matter having come on regularly for a jury trial on September 30, 1980, the Defendant having been present, the plaintiff's attorney having been present and the plaintiff having failed to appear, the Defendant through her attorney having orally made a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and grant defendant's counterclaim ... It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that upon call of the case in open court and the plaintiff having failed to appear and the plaintiff being made to give sufficient cause for her failure to appear, defendant's motions are hereby granted dismissing plaintiff's complaint and allowing defendant's counterclaim ..." We reverse.

A dismissal for want of prosecution based upon the non-appearance of the plaintiff is not warranted where plaintiff's counsel is present in his client's stead. See Elmer Fox, Westheimer & Co. v. B-X Corp., 146 Ga.App. 385, 386, 246 S.E.2d 413 (1978); Franks v. Reid, 128 Ga.App. 454, 197 S.E.2d 154 (1973); Johnston v. Dollar, 89 Ga.App. 876, 881, 81 S.E.2d 502 (1954). As appellant's absence at the time her case was called is the sole basis of the trial court's ruling, the judgment must be reversed. ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Daniels v. Burson
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 6, 2002
    ...prosecution based upon the non-appearance of the plaintiff is not warranted where plaintiff's counsel is present in his client's stead." Long v. Cochran.6 In her affidavit, Taunya Burson did not indicate any additional evidence or defenses she would have presented, had she attended the tria......
  • Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • April 15, 1981