Long v. Faulkner, (No. 2136.)
Court | Supreme Court of Georgia |
Writing for the Court | FISH |
Citation | 108 S.E. 370,151 Ga. 837 |
Parties | LONG. v. FAULKNER et al. |
Docket Number | (No. 2136.) |
Decision Date | 13 September 1921 |
LONG.
v.
FAULKNER et al.
(No. 2136.)
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Sept. 13, 1921.
Error from Superior Court, Camden County; J. P. Highsmith, Judge.
Suit by S. M. Long against James Faulkner and another. An interlocutory injunction was refused, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed.
Cowart & Vocelle, of St. Marys, for plaintiff in error.
S. C. Townsend, of St. Marys, for defendants in error.
FISH, C. J. Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except ATKINSON, J., disqualified.
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
Price v. United States, 19-1408
...easement takes title to the centerline. See R.G. Foster & Co. v. Fountain, 114 S.E.2d 863, 871 (Ga. 1960) (citing 14 Long v. Faulkner, 108 S.E. 370 (Ga. 1921)). The rationale behind a centerline presumption is the strips-and-gores doctrine, as the Fambro court explained: It is favorable to ......
-
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Datry, No. 30310
...with settled principles of Georgia law (see R. G. Foster & Co. v. Fountain, 216 Ga. 113, 123, 114 S.E.2d 863 (1960); Long v. Faulkner, 151 Ga. 837(1, 2), 108 S.E. 370 (1921)), and is not contested by the defendants. Therefore, we will accept this conclusion as legally A hearing was held on ......
-
R. G. Foster & Co. v. Fountain, s. 20887
......S. Highway No. 1 in the City of Swainsboro. It was alleged: The petitioner is the owner ... Long v. Faulkner, 151 Ga. 837, 103 S.E. 370. In ground 10 of ......
-
Thomas v. Douglas, 64959
...to the fee is not in the public or another. See R.G. Foster & Company v. Fountain, 216 Ga. 113, 123, 114 S.E.2d 863; Long v. Faulkner, 151 Ga. 837(1), 108 S.E. 370; Silvey v. McCool, 86 Ga. 1(1), 12 S.E. 175; Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Datry, 235 Ga. 568, 570, 220 S.E.2......
Request a trial to view additional results