Lopez v. New York City Housing Authority

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationLopez v. New York City Housing Authority, 597 N.Y.S.2d 402, 193 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Decision Date18 May 1993
PartiesFrancisca LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent-Respondent.

Before MURPHY, P.J., and MILONAS, ROSENBERGER and WALLACH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered on or about October 2, 1992, which denied petitioner's application to serve a late notice of claim and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed without costs and disbursements.

We agree with the IAS court that notwithstanding the accident report prepared by respondent's staff on the same day that petitioner fell in respondent's building, the record does not show that respondent had actual knowledge of the claim and that the failure of petitioner's two prior attorneys to timely serve a notice of claim is not a sufficient excuse for the delay (see, Chattergoon v. New York City...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Anderson v. Town of Oyster Bay
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 5, 2012
    ...N.Y.S.2d 452;Matter of Roland v. Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs., 35 A.D.3d 477, 478, 828 N.Y.S.2d 94;Lopez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 193 A.D.2d 473, 474, 597 N.Y.S.2d 402). Furthermore, the petitioner failed to establish that the Town of Oyster Bay acquired actual knowledge of the......
  • Seif v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 24, 1995
    ...to justify the relief sought (Barzaga v. New York City Hous. Auth., supra, at 164, 612 N.Y.S.2d 122; Lopez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 193 A.D.2d 473, 597 N.Y.S.2d 402), as the affidavit contains nothing more than conclusory assertions totally devoid of any specific statements of what was......
  • Keeney v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 24, 2019
    ...claim (see Zapata v. New York City Hous. Auth., 115 A.D.3d 606, 982 N.Y.S.2d 130 [1st Dept. 2014] ; Lopez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 193 A.D.2d 473, 597 N.Y.S.2d 402 [1st Dept. 1993] ). Contrary to plaintiffs' contention, there was no basis to equitably estop defendant from seeking dismi......
  • Reaves v. New York City Hous. Auth., 2004 NY Slip Op 50782(U) (NY 6/22/2004)
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 22, 2004
    ...but consciously failed to avail itself of that opportunity, to its own prejudice. The First Department's decision in Lopez v. NYCHA, (193 A.D.2d 473 [1st Dept. 1993]), cited by respondent, is bereft of sufficient facts to enable this court to analyze its applicability to the case at bar. Mo......
  • Get Started for Free