Lopez v. Smith

Citation173 F.3d 749
Decision Date12 April 1999
Docket NumberA-2R,No. 97-16987,97-16987
PartiesMax LOPEZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.A. SMITH, Warden; Larry Loo, Chief Medical Officer; A. Acevedo, Chief Dental Officer; Patterson, Counselor 4; R. Keiner, Dentist; M.P. McClure, 4 Appeals Coordinator, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lopez v. Smith, 160 F.3d 567 (9th Cir.1998) is withdrawn.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Lopez v. Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 10 Febrero 2000
    ...to dismiss without giving him an opportunity to amend his complaint. A panel of this court rejected his argument. See Lopez v. Smith, 160 F.3d 567 (9th Cir. 1998). Although the panel acknowledged that longstanding Ninth Circuit case law required a district court to provide a pro se claimant......
  • Leiva-Montalvo v. I.N.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 22 Abril 1999
    ... ... § 208.16(b)(2)). According to Leiva-Montalvo, the Recontras specifically threatened his life at least twice. See Vilorio-Lopez v. INS, 852 F.2d 1137, 1141 (9th Cir.1988) ("A key factor in finding evidence sufficient for withholding of deportation is whether harm or threats of ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT