Lorden v. United States, Civ. No. 7686.
| Decision Date | 22 April 1949 |
| Docket Number | Civ. No. 7686. |
| Citation | 83 F. Supp. 822 |
| Parties | LORDEN v. UNITED STATES et al. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
John F. Drum, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.
George F. Garrity, U. S. Atty. and William J. Koen, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for defendant United States.
William A. McGivney, of North Attleboro, Mass., for Mrs. Anges McGettrick.
This action concerns the distribution of the proceeds of a policy of National Service Life Insurance issued to Francis P. Lorden, a deceased veteran. The mother has filed a claim with the Veterans Administration which has been denied. The insured designated the impleaded defendant, Agnes McGettrick, as the beneficiary of his insurance policy, and stated that she stood in loco parentis to him. The Board of Veterans Appeal of the Veterans Administration reached the conclusion that Mrs. McGettrick stood in the relationship claimed by the insured. The action in this Court was instituted by Mrs. Lorden bringing suit against the Veterans Administration on the policy. The Government answered and impleaded Mrs. McGettrick as another defendant so that upon the Court's determination there could be one final settlement.
Findings of Fact.
Francis P. Lorden and his brother lived with their mother until he was fourteen years of age. Some trouble developed among them and the two boys then went to live with Mrs. McGettrick. Mrs. McGettrick had a boy of approximately the same age, and she took the Lorden boys into her home and continuously up to the time they went into the service accorded them the same treatment that she gave her own children. The boys responded to this treatment and became attached to Mrs. McGettrick and her husband. Later they gave her many gifts, including a diamond ring and various electrical household appliances. The deceased exhibited no affection towards his mother and deeply resented the episode which had caused the boys to leave home. The evidence is overwhelming, and I find as a fact, that at all times, from his fourteenth birthday on to the day of his death, the defendant, Mrs. McGettrick, stood in loco parentis to the insured and is thus entitled to the benefits of his insurance policy.
This case is clearly distinguishable on the facts from Strauss v. United States, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 1017. In that case the minor had been placed with the defendant, Sadie Goldbaum, by a Jewish Welfare Society under an arrangement whereby the Society paid Mrs....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Estate of Larson
...(2d Cir. 1951) 191 F.2d 194, 196, reversed on other grounds, 344 U.S. 82, 84, 73 S.Ct. 122, 97 L.Ed. 111 (1952); Lorden v. United States (D.Mass.1949) 83 F.Supp. 822, 823 (both finding in loco parentis relationship for purposes of National Service Life Insurance benefits despite receipt of ......
-
Diana P., In re
...in loco parentis status, Miller v. Davis, 49 Misc.2d 764, 268 N.Y.S.2d 490 (1966), others have taken a broader view, Lorden v. United States, 83 F.Supp. 822 (D.Mass.1949). The amount paid to the B.'s is hardly sufficient to demonstrate that the primary responsibility for Diana's support is ......
-
Estate of Larson
...Cir. 1951) 191 F.2d 194, 196, reversed on other grounds, 344 U.S. 82, 84, 73 S.Ct. 122, 123, 97 L.Ed. 111 (1952); Lorden v. United States (D.Mass.1949) 83 F.Supp. 822, 823 (both finding in loco parentis relationship for purposes of National Service Life Insurance benefits despite receipt of......
-
D'Auria v. Liposky
...stood in loco parentis to the insured even though the claimant had received some assistance from a welfare agency in raising him. In the Lorden case, court distinguished the Strauss decision on the ground that the boy in that case had been furnished nothing but board, while in the case befo......