Lost Creek Associates, LLC v. Marine Midland Bank

Decision Date29 April 2002
Citation293 A.D.2d 719,741 N.Y.S.2d 115
PartiesLOST CREEK ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>MARINE MIDLAND BANK et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

O'Brien, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs sought a loan from the defendants to finance the construction of a mixed-use commercial and residential ski resort in Telluride, Colorado.By letter dated July 3, 1997, the defendants, Marine Midland Bank and Marine Midland Realty Credit Corporation(hereinafter MMB), set forth a preliminary summary of the loan terms they would be willing to "submit to [their] senior management for approval."The letter outlined a bridge loan in the amount of $1 million and a construction loan in the amount of $9.6 million.Repayment of the bridge loan was required within 90-180 days, or upon the funding of the construction loan, whichever was earlier.The letter also provided that "this extension must be reviewed and approved by MMB's senior management," and in the event that senior management "approves the extension," it would "only become effective after formal documents, satisfactory to MMB, are executed by all parties."

The plaintiffs aver that before the closing of the $1 million loan on July 22, 1997, an MMB senior vice-president told them that the construction loan would close after the parties returned from their respective vacations.The parties conducted ongoing negotiations and drafted the customary document proposals in the interim,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Moulton Paving, LLC v. Town of Poughkeepsie
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 19, 2012
    ...Municipal Consultants & Publs. v. Town of Ramapo, 47 N.Y.2d 144, 148, 417 N.Y.S.2d 218, 390 N.E.2d 1143;Lost Cr. Assoc. v. Marine Midland Bank, 293 A.D.2d 719, 720, 741 N.Y.S.2d 115). “Moreover, when the parties' intent to be bound by a contractual obligation ‘is determinable by written agr......
  • In re Westinghouse Elec. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 1, 2018
    ...terms of a transaction. Schwartz v. Greenberg , 304 N.Y. 250, 254, 107 N.E.2d 65 (N.Y. 1952) ; Lost CR Assoc. v. Marine Midland Bank , 293 A.D.2d 719, 741 N.Y.S.2d 115, 116 (2d Dep't 2002). Courts have identified a number of factors that aid in determining in a particular case whether a bin......
  • 223 Sam, LLC v. 223 15th St., LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 2, 2018
    ...out and signed" ( Scheck v. Francis, 26 N.Y.2d 466, 469–470, 311 N.Y.S.2d 841, 260 N.E.2d 493 ; see Lost Creek Assoc. v. Marine Midland Bank, 293 A.D.2d 719, 720, 741 N.Y.S.2d 115 ). However, "if the parties intended to be bound by an oral agreement, a mere failure to reduce their promises ......
  • Lacey v. Long Island Lighting Company
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 29, 2002

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT