Loubet v. Loubet
| Decision Date | 08 June 1967 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | Elizabeth LOUBET v. Albert E. LOUBET. |
Stephen N. Schaffer, Norwalk, with whom, on the brief, was Richard S. Weinstein, Norwalk, for appellant (defendant).
J. Richard Fay, So. Norwalk, with whom, on the brief, was Kenneth Garfunkel, So. Norwalk, for appellee (plaintiff).
Before KING, C.J., and ALCORN, HOUSE, THIM and RYAN, JJ.
The opposing affidavit of the defendant contained no recital of facts which would be admissible in evidence, nor was any documentary proof submitted to show that there was a genuine issue as to any material fact alleged in the complaint. Practice Book §§ 300, 303; Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 228 A.2d 149; Rathkopf v. Pearson, 148 Conn. 260, 263, 170 A.2d 135.
There is no error.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission of City of Stamford
...to all matters stated in the affadavit.' Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co., 157 Conn. 226, 228, 253 A.2d 22, 23; see Loubet v. Loubet, 155 Conn. 695, 696, 230 A.2d 552. Mere statements of legal conclusions or that an issue of fact does exist are not sufficient to raise the issue. Kasowit......
-
Procurement, LLC v. Nicholas Ahuja, Executor of Estate of
Gurpreet Ahuja
... ... 226, 229 (1968); McColl v. Pataky, 160 ... Conn. 457, 460 (1971); Dowling v. Kielak, 160 Conn ... 14, 17 (1970); Loubet v. Loubet, 155 Conn. 695, 696 ... (1967); see also James & Hazard, Civil Procedure (2d ... Ed. 1977) pp. 149-50. A party seeking to ... ...
-
Ellum v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
...to repeat the rules of law applicable in a situation like the one before us. We need only to refer to such cases as Loubet v. Loubet, 155 Conn. 695, 230 A.2d 552, Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 614, 228 A.2d 149, 152, Pistey v. Vlastaris, 151 Conn. 716, 717, 201 A.......
-
Citizens Nat. Bank v. Hubney
...v. Pataky, 160 Conn. 457, 460, 280 A.2d 146 (1971); Dowling v. Kielak, 160 Conn. 14, 17, 273 A.2d 716 (1970); Loubet v. Loubet, 155 Conn. 695, 696, 230 A.2d 552 (1967); see also James & Hazard, Civil Procedure (2d Ed. 1977) pp. 149-50. A party seeking to resist summary judgment may not rely......