Loudin v. Mohawk Airlines, Inc.

• Decision Date: 29 June 1965
• Citation: Loudin v. Mohawk Airlines, Inc., 260 N.Y.S.2d 899, 24 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
• Parties: Donald J. LOUDIN, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. MOHAWK AIRLINES, INC., Robert E. Peach, Carl A. Benscoter, Defendants-Respondents-Appellants.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 899

260 N.Y.S.2d 899

24 A.D.2d 447

Donald J. LOUDIN, Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v.MOHAWK AIRLINES, INC., Robert E. Peach, Carl A. BenscoterDefendants-Respondents-Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 29, 1965.

Robert A. Dwyer, New York City, of counsel(Charles F. Krause, New York City, with him on the brief; Speiser, Shumate, Geoghan & Krause, New York City, Attorneys), for plaintiff-appellant-respondent.

J. Howard Carter, New York City, of counsel(James W. Rodgers and Anson M. Keller, New York City, with him on the brief; Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, Attorneys), for defendants-respondents-appellants.

Before RABIN, J. P., and McNALLY, STEVENS, STEUER and STALEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order entered on December 18, 1964 granting the motion of defendants, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., Robert E. Peach, and Carl A. Benscoter, to dismiss the second, fourth, and fifth causes of action of the amended complaint herein and denying the motion of said defendants to dismiss the sixth and seventh causes of action of the amended complaint for insufficiency, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, by granting the motion to dismiss the sixth and seventh causes of action for failure to state a cause of action and otherwise affirmed with $30 costs and disbursements...