Louisiana Discount Corporation v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 13620.

Decision Date18 January 1952
Docket NumberNo. 13620.,13620.
Citation193 F.2d 495
PartiesLOUISIANA DISCOUNT CORPORATION Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

DeQuincy V. Sutton, Hattiesburg, Miss., for petitioner.

Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Charles Oliphant, Ch. Cnsl. Bur. Int. Rev., W. Herman Schwatka, Sp. Atty. Bur. Int. Rev., Washington, D. C., Virginia H. Adams, Carolyn R. Just, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Poynor v. Commissioner, 81 F.2d 521, the judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • In re Imperial Sheet Metal, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • 12 Enero 1973
    ...a referee in bankruptcy creates no exception."' See also In re Harris Bros., D.C., 5 F.Supp. 191." See also Louisiana Discount Corporation v. C. I. R., 193 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1952), a Louisiana case involving the filing a petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United The ......
  • Van De Veer v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 9 Diciembre 1957
    ...which delayed the mail. Poynor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 81 F.2d 521; see also, Louisiana Discount Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 495; Di Prospero v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 9 Cir., 176 F.2d As we interpret the language in ques......
  • Lejeune v. Midwestern Ins. Co. of Oklahoma City, Okl., 14071.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 5 Junio 1952
    ...to persons living in the same place with the clerk than to persons living at other places. We cannot agree. In Louisiana Discount Corp. v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 495, having to do with the filing with the Tax Court of a petition for review, the same claim was made to, and rejected b......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT