Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Harrison
Decision Date | 18 August 1919 |
Citation | 83 So. 89,78 Fla. 381 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Parties | LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO. v. HARRISON. |
Error to Circuit Court, Santa Rosa County; A. G. Campbell, Judge.
Action by W. W. Harrison against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company.Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.Reversed.
Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
Syllabus by the Court
When the driver of an automobile attempts to cross a railroad track at a road crossing and has ample time to do so, but his engine chokes down and the automobile stops upon the railroad track, and it is not alleged in the declaration that the choking down of the engine was caused by the defective condition of the railroad crossing, the proximate cause of the accident is the stopping of the automobile, and the railroad is not guilty of negligence in not assuming that it would break down and stop on its track, provided that when the railroad employés saw that it had stopped on the track they at once did everything in their power to stop the train.
An engineer in charge of the locomotive of a train has the right to presume that an automobile crossing the railroad track a quarter of a mile ahead of his train will be over and away in ample time before his train reaches the crossing, and he is not called upon to presume that the automobile would choke down and stop on the track.
COUNSEL R. A. McGeachy, of Milton, for plaintiff in error.
W. W Clark, of Milton, for defendant in error.
The defendant in error recovered damages from the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company for the destruction of his automobile by the plaintiff in error's train.He undertook to cross the railroad track about a quarter of a mile from a curve.When he got on the track his engine choked and his car stopped.He testified in part as follows:
The immediate cause of the injury was the choking down of the plaintiff...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Columbus & Greenville R. Co. v. Lee
...Banc. Affirmed. Gardner, Odom & Gardner, for appellant. The stalling of the car was the proximate cause of this accident. L. & N. R. Co. v. Harrison (Fla.), 83 So. 89; Barrett v. U. S. R. R. Administration, 194 N.W. Mr. Steen, witness for plaintiff, contends that the whistle was not blown, ......
-
Stevens v. Tampa Electric Co.
... ... Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v ... Thompson, 57 Fla. 155, 48 So. 750; Louisville & ... Nashville R. R. Co. v. Harrison, 78 Fla. 381, 83 So. 89; ... Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v ... ...
-
Stringfellow v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
...guilty of negligence in not guarding against the possibility of the automobile breaking down when on its track." Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Harrison, 78 Fla. 381, 83 So. 89, 90. In Egley v. S. A. L. R. Co., 84 Fla. 147, 93 So. 170, 171, the judgment of the court was "affirmed, on the authori......
- Adams v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.