Lovell v. Town of Charlestown
Decision Date | 31 July 1891 |
Citation | 32 A. 160,66 N.H. 584 |
Parties | LOVELL v. TOWN OF CHARLESTOWN et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Bill in equity by Bolivar Lovell, trustee, against the town of Charlestown and others, for direction under a will.
Asahel Porter, of Alstead, deceased on the 22d day of July, 1862, leaving a last will and testament, dated February 10, 1862, which was duly admitted to probate. In said will are certain legacies, to take effect immediately after the death of the testator, which, with the debts and expenses of administration, have been paid. Besides said legacies, said will contains the following provisions, viz.: The widow of said testator, on the 7th day of October, 1862, in the probate court for said county, duly waived the provisions of said will in her favor. August 17, 1877, the petitioner was appointed by the probate court trustee under said will, and as such trustee received on October 13, 1877, $2,215.19, which sum, with the accumulation thereof, he now holds. The widow of said testator died in January, 1891, and none of the legacies named in the portion of the will herein quoted have been paid. Your petitioner, being in doubt as to the true construction of said will, and the rights of the legatees and their representatives under it, asks the court to instruct him as to his duties, and how said fund shall be distributed, and more particularly on the following questions:
The following questions are presented: (1) Is the bequest to the town of Charlestown of such a nature that said town can legally accept and hold the same? (2) Did tie legacies of $1,000 and $500 become due and payable to the respective legatees upon the date of the waiver of the will or upon the death of the testator's widow? (3) Do the accumulations of interest upon said legacies now belong to said town alone, as it claims, or do they belong to said Jeannette Pratt, the representatives of Burrill Porter, and said town, in proportion as they are entitled to receive the principal? Burrill Porter has died since the decease of the testator. The executors of his will, and also ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Aberg v. First Nat. Bank in Dallas
...v. Harrison, 1 Pat. & H. 197; Blackwell v. Virginia Trust Co., 177 Va. 299, 14 S.E.2d 301, 303 (1941). New Hampshire: Lovell v. Town of Charleston, 66 N.H. 584, 32 A. 160. Maine: United States Trust Co. of New York v. Douglass, 143 Me. 150, 56 A.2d 633 (1948). Mississippi: Rose v. Rose, 126......
-
St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Kern
... ... 59, 127 Ga. 766; Brandenburg v ... Thorndike, 139 Mass. 102, 28 N.E. 575; Lovell v ... Charlestown, 66 N.H. 584, 32 A. 160; In re ... Rogers, 97 Md. 674, 55 A. 679; Augustus ... ...
-
Crossan v. Crossan
...St. 276, 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 272; Hamlin v. Thomas, 126 Pa. St. 20; Fowler v. Samuel, 257 Ill. 30, Ann. Cas. 1914 A. 854; Lowell v. Town of Charlestown, 66 N.H. 584; Blatchford v. Newberry, 99 Ill. 1, 47; v. Wakefield, 256 Ill. 296, Ann. Cas. 1913E. 414, 422; Hauk v. McComas, 98 Ind. 460. (......
-
Keene v. Union Sch. Dist, 2990.
...possessing equity jurisdiction, to enforce and perfect the objects of the trust." This case was incorrectly stated in Lovell v. Charlestown, 66 N.H. 584, 585, 32 A. 160, as holding that a town might administer a fund given for its schools or In Sargent v. Cornish, 1873, 54 N.H. 18, 22, the ......