Lovett v. State, 4 Div. 245.
Decision Date | 19 February 1942 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 245. |
Citation | 6 So.2d 441,242 Ala. 356 |
Parties | Charles LOVETT v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
L. A. Farmer, of Dothan, for petitioner.
Thos. S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and Noble J. Russell, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.
Petition of Charles Lovett for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Lovett v. State, 6 So.2d 437.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Friedkin
...14 So.2d 363 244 Ala. 494 STATE v. FRIEDKIN. 1 Div. 195.Supreme Court of AlabamaJune 24, 1943 [14 So.2d 364] ... 3 and 4 was overruled ... Count 2 ... charged defendant with the ... this respect. To the same effect is Lovett v. State, ... 30 Ala.App. 334, 6 So.2d 437, certiorari denied 242 Ala ... ...
-
Elmore v. State
... ... Hardin v. State, 241 Ala. 4, 3 So.2d 89 (1941), (judicial notice taken of the rules and regulations ... of the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations); Lovett v. State, 30 Ala.App. 334, 6 So.2d 437 (1942), cert. denied, 242 ... ...
-
Gandy v. City of Birmingham
...offense known to the criminal law. They were properly refused. Lovett v. State, 30 Ala.App. 334, 6 So.2d 437, certiorari denied 242 Ala. 356, 6 So.2d 441, determined in wet counties non-licensed persons could not keep liquor for sale, even though such liquor may have been lawfully acquired.......
-
Smith v. State ex rel. Sullinger
...West v. State ex rel. Matthews, 223 Ala. 588, 173 So. 46; Lovett v. State, 30 Ala.App. 334, 6 So.2d 437, certiorari denied 242 Ala. 356, 6 So.2d 441; Title 29, Sec. 140, Code of Alabama 1940. The intoxicating beverages which the testimony showed were being illegally sold at the appellant's ......