Lowe v. Duckworth, 81-1745
| Decision Date | 09 November 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 81-1745,81-1745 |
| Citation | 663 F.2d 42 |
| Parties | Thad Douglas LOWE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack DUCKWORTH, Warden, Indiana State Prison, and Theodore Sendak, Attorney General, State of Indiana, Respondents-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Carlton Lowe, Park Forest South, Ill., for petitioner-appellant.
David A. Arthur, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, Ind., for respondents-appellees.
Before PELL, SPRECHER, and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Thad Douglas Lowe appeals from the district court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. When Lowe filed his petition in district court, his post-conviction relief motion 1 was still pending in state court. Lowe argued to the district court that, notwithstanding the pendency of the state court proceeding, his federal petition should not be dismissed on exhaustion grounds because his state remedy was ineffective. 2 Lowe's state motion had lain dormant for nearly three and one-half years despite his attempts, by writing to the state court judge, to obtain a ruling on his motion.
The district court's dismissal of Lowe's petition was clearly erroneous. Dozie v. Cady, 430 F.2d 637 (7th Cir. 1970). Where state court delay is inordinate, the district court must hold a hearing to determine whether the delay is justifiable. If it is not justifiable, the court must hear the habeas petition on its merits. Ibid. A seventeen-month delay is inordinate. Ibid. Therefore a three-and-one-half-year delay is also inordinate, triggering the above-described hearing.
Since the filing of this appeal, however, Lowe's federal habeas petition has been rendered moot. The state court before which Lowe's state motion was pending rendered a final decision dated July 14, 1981, granting Lowe a new trial. The attorneys of record were notified of this order approximately ten days to two weeks later. On August 7, 1981, a new arraignment date was set for Lowe. On August 10, 1981, Lowe was released from prison on bond pending the new arraignment. On August 26, 1981, respondents moved to dismiss this appeal as moot. When all the relief sought has been obtained, there no longer exists a live controversy, and the case must be dismissed as moot. Madyun v. Thompson, 657 F.2d 868, at 872 (7th Cir. 1981), slip opinion at 4. Lowe's conviction has been declared null and void, and he can obtain no further remedy by way of the present habeas petition.
The district court's dismissal of the petition for failure to exhaust state remedies is vacated. The case is remanded to ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nesglo, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NA
...on the ground that issue on which writ was granted had been rendered moot by an intervening state court decision); Lowe v. Duckworth, 663 F.2d 42 (7th Cir. 1981) (federal habeas corpus petition rendered moot on appeal by intervening state court decision ordering a new trial. Since the court......
-
Calhoun v. Farley
...the concerns of comity and federalism. Such has occurred in this case. Therefore, this court finds that pursuant to Lowe v. Duckworth, 663 F.2d 42 (7th Cir.1981) and Dozie v. Cady, 430 F.2d 637 (7th Cir.1970) sufficient time has passed to excuse the need for exhausting state Respondent also......
-
Heon v. RI Attorney Gen.'s Office, CA 12-44 ML
...in light of the fact that it took more than nineteen months for him to receive the February 2, 2012, hearing. See Lowe v. Duckworth, 663 F.2d 42, 43 (7th Cir. 1981)("A seventeen monthPage 16delay in inordinate."); see also Jackson v. Duckworth, 112 F.3d 878, 881 (7th Cir. 1997)("Inordinate,......
-
Carter v. Buesgen
...General's office. See Dozie v. Cady , 430 F.2d 637, 638 (7th Cir. 1970) (seventeen-month delay is inordinate); Lowe v. Duckworth , 663 F.2d 42, 43 (7th Cir. 1981) (three-and-one-half-year delay is inordinate). Everyone doing nothing is no longer an option.Carter has demonstrated what Congre......