Lowery v. Fuller
Decision Date | 05 April 1926 |
Parties | FRANK LOWERY, APPELLANT, v. J. E. FULLER, RESPONDENT. [*] |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston County.--Hon. Arch M Davis, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Judgment affirmed.
A. G Knight for appellant.
Ed. C Hyde, Laurence M. Hyde and Ira B. Hyde for respondents.
Trimble, P. J., absent.
This is an action in damages based upon an alleged violation of the terms of a contract for the sale of stock of the Fuller Lumber Company, a corporation.
The Fuller Lumber Company, a Missouri corporation, was operating six lumber yards in the States of Missouri and Iowa. In 1921, J. E. Fuller was president, Frank Lowery (plaintiff herein) secretary, and Roy Miller, treasurer of said company, the three owning all the capital stock of the concern consisting of 1250 shares. Fuller owned 850 shares, Lowery 250 and Miller 150. Lowery had charge of the books of the company and did part of the buying and auditing. Lowery and Fuller lived at Princeton, Mo., where the company maintained a yard and the principal offices of the company. Roy Miller lived at Trenton and managed a yard which the company maintained at that place. As shown by the record, Fuller received a salary of $ 2400, Lowery $ 3,000 and Miller $ 1800 per year for their services.
On March 24, 1921, Fuller and Lowery entered into a written contract by the terms of which Fuller sold Lowery the 850 shares of the capital stock of the company owned by him, for the price and sum of $ 185 per share, payment to be made as stipulated. The contract is not long and therefore may be set out in full herein, as follows:
From the second paragraph in the contract it is readily seen that Lowery and such others as he might procure to take stock were purchasing all of J. E. Fuller's holdings in the corporation. It appears the company was prosperous and paid substantial dividends. As part of his dividend for the year 1920, Lowery accepted a note of one W. L. Collings for $ 1950 which had been given to the company for a bill of lumber purchased. The said note was dated June 1, 1920, due December 1, 1920, and was endorsed to Lowery as follows:
It further appears that in 1921 Lowery and Miller (brothers-in-law) became dissatisfied and Miller resigned and opened an opposition lumber yard in Trenton, Mo. Thereupon Lowery refused to have anything to do with the Company's yard in Trenton and Fuller personally took charge of it and on March 24, 1921, the contract above set out was entered into.
As part of the $ 30,000 required by the terms of the contract to be paid upon its execution, Lowery delivered to Fuller the $ 1950 Collings note, on which he made the following endorsement:
On April 8, 1921, Fuller collected the interest to that date on the said note and $ 500 on the principal and endorsed the note without recourse to the Fuller State Bank of Princeton, Mo., of which he was president. Thereafter the bank collected from Collings the interest and an additional sum of $ 200 on the principal.
In 1922, Collings was declared a bankrupt and the Fuller State Bank brought suit against Lowery on his endorsement and guaranty of the Collings note. Lowery filed a demurrer to the petition in that suit and the bank thereupon filed an amended petition embracing the facts just stated and alleging that Lowery assigned said note after maturity to Fuller for a consideration of $ 2077.33, guaranteed payment, waiving demand notice, protest and notice of non-payment and agreed to extension of time without notice; that Fuller endorsed the note without recourse to the bank, after maturity, for a consideration of $ 1556.66. Lowery's answer to the petition was a general denial. A judgment was rendered in favor of the bank and against Lowery for $ 1379.16 and $ 75 attorney's fee, and on November 7, 1922, Lowery paid the judgment.
As stated in the contract between Fuller and Lowery for the sale of the stock, the Fuller Lumber Company owed the U.S. Government a balance on its 1920 income tax of $ 6150. The company's return showed that it owed the U.S. income and excess profit tax in the sum of $ 8207.70; but before the execution of the contract now involved, and when the return was sent to the collector of internal revenue, a payment of $ 2057.70 was made, thus leaving a balance of $ 6150 as above indicated.
The record discloses that at the date of the contract the Missouri state income tax for 1920 in the sum of $ 483.16 was not paid. In 1922, there was an additional assessment of $ 745.71 paid by the corporation which, in the meantime, had changed its corporate name to the Lowery-Miller Lumber Company. Thereafter Lowery procured an assignment from the other holders of stock in the corporation of such rights as it was claimed they had against Fuller, under the contract, and this suit followed.
The petition alleges the formal matter above stated and charges that the Fuller Lumber Company thereby became and was liable for all the amounts so paid by plaintiff, and that plaintiff was compelled to pay the Fuller State Bank and that said note and endorsement constituted a liability and outstanding obligation of said company to plaintiff.
It is further alleged in the petition that by the terms of the contract entered into between Frank Lowery and J. E. Fuller, aforesaid, said Fuller agreed that outside the regular yard indebtedness for merchandise bought and not paid for, the said Fuller, on behalf of said company, had incurred no indebtedness against said company except for salaries and wages; that it was further understood and agreed that the said Fuller Lumber Company owed the U.S. Government a balance of $ 6150 based upon the 1920 return, and that any additional assessment for income tax should be paid by the then stockholders of the Fuller Lumber Company, to-wit, J. E. Fuller, Frank Lowery and Roy Miller, in proportion to the number of shares owned by each; that at the date of said contract, in addition to the $ 6150 owing to the U.S. Government by the Fuller Lumber Company there was an additional assessment of $ 745.71 due the U.S. Government for the year 1920 and a State Income Tax for the year 1920, of $ 483.13, all of which the Fuller Lumber Company, after the purchase of the stock aforesaid, was compelled to, and did, pay and which by the terms of said agreement, the said J. E. Fuller was obligated to pay to plaintiff and others purchasing said stock his proportionate share, to-wit, 850/1250ths of said total sum of $ 1228.84, or the sum of $ 835.46, which said Fuller refused to pay; and that said Fuller further refused to pay the judgment, note and attorney's fee.
Judgment is sought herein for the amount of his proportionate share of the judgment referred to, together with the amount of the income tax paid as alleged in the sum of $ 833.46, or a total sum of $ 1849.62, together with interest and costs.
The note in question is filed as an exhibit and is in words and figures as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ireland v. Shukert
... ... S.W. 217, 273; Cox v. Fire Brick Co., 230 Mo.App ... 774, 783, 75 S.W.2d 621, 625; 28 C. J. Guaranty, sec. (51) ... (2), p. 919; Fuller v. Toole Dry Goods Co., 189 ... Mo.App. 514, 176 S.W. 1091; 28 C. J., p. 921; Thompson v ... McCune, 333 Mo. 758, 765, 63 S.W.2d 41, 63; ... Warder Bushnell & Glessner Co. v. Johnson, 114 ... Mo.App. 571, 90 S.W. 393; Binz v. Hyatt, 200 Mo ... 299, 308, 98 S.W. 637, 639; Lowery v. Fuller, 221 ... Mo.App. 495, 281 S.W. 968; Mercantile Trust Co. v. Dulle ... et al., 282 S.W. 414, 415; Dunham v. Hinton, ... 332 Mo. 517, ... ...
-
Boston Elevated Ry. Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
... ... "liabilities." It is on the latter word that the ... company relies. "Debt" and "indebtedness" ... are not synonymous with "liability." Lowery v ... Fuller, 221 Mo.App. 495, 503. "Liabilities" is a ... term "of large significance," and is technically ... more inclusive. Price v. Parker, ... ...
-
Cameron, Joyce & Co. v. State Highway Com'n
...Peery v. Cooper, 8 Mo. 152; Globe American Corp. v. Miller Hatcheries, Inc., 110 S.W.2d 393; 9 C. J. 831, sec. 169; Lowery v. Fuller, 281 S.W. 968, 221 Mo.App. 495. J. All concur except Hays, J., absent. OPINION GANTT Action to recover $ 8535.50 on the first count and $ 7255.28 on the secon......
- Mutual Orange Distributors v. Black