Lowther v. Southern Carbon Co.
Decision Date | 25 April 1927 |
Docket Number | 26376 |
Citation | 112 So. 711,163 La. 757 |
Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
Parties | LOWTHER et al v. SOUTHERN CARBON CO |
Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita; Fred M. Odom, Judge.
Suit by Charles A. Lowther, individually and as tutor for minors Marvin and Wesley Lowther, against the Southern Carbon Company. From a judgment rejecting plaintiffs' demands they appeal.
Affirmed.
M. C Redmond, of Monroe, and Todd & Todd, of Bastrop, for appellants.
McHenry Montgomery, Lamkin & Lamkin, of Monroe, for appellee.
This is a suit for damages and for an injunction restraining and prohibiting the defendant from conducting certain operations of a carbon plant on land owned by it within a distance less than two miles from the residence of the plaintiffs. The suit was tried on the merits, and, from a judgment rejecting the plaintiffs' demands, they appealed.
The petition alleges that plaintiffs own a tract of land, in indivision, on which they reside; that defendant owns land adjoining the plaintiffs' property; that, during the two years preceding the filing of the petition in this suit, the defendant erected a carbon manufacturing plant on its said property near the division line separating its property from that of the plaintiffs and in close proximity to the plaintiffs' residence; that, during the year prior to November 27, 1920, the operation of defendant's plant on said site damaged the plaintiffs to the extent of $ 6,000 for this, to wit:
The defendant answered the suit, admitted the recital of facts averred in the preliminary paragraphs of the petition, but denied every other allegation therein. Before the case was tried, the following compromise agreement was entered into:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mississippi Power Co. v. Ballard Et At
...v. McGavock, 106 So. 597; Comfort v. Kosciusko, 88 Miss. 611, 41 So. 268; Desporte v. Biloxi, 100 So. 387, 136 Miss. 542; Lowther v. So. Carbon Co., 112 So. 711; v. Mason, 133 So. 689; Alabama Power Co. v. Keystone Lime Co., 191 Ala. 58, 67 So. 833. Damages cannot be received from diminutio......
-
Daigle v. Continental Oil Company, 10524
...Defendants distinguish the facts here from those cases and insist that applicable under these circumstances are Lowther, et al. v. Southern Carbon, 163 La. 757, 112 So. 711, and O'Neal, et al. v. Southern Carbon, 216 La. 96, 43 So.2d 230. Plaintiffs, in their written arguments, predicate th......
- Luthy v. Philip Werlein Co., Inc.