Loyd v. Bank

Decision Date20 March 1890
CitationLoyd v. Bank, 11 S.E. 104, 86 Va. 690 (1890)
PartiesLoyd. v. Lynchburg Nat. Bank.
CourtVirginia Supreme Court

Pledge—Rights of Pledgee.

A note executed by a firm to a bank recited that the firm had deposited as collateral security a $5,000 note, indorsed by the father of one of the partners, and that it would give additional security if demanded, the same to be subject to sale or exchange; and "if we [the firm] shall come under any other liability, or enter into any other engagement with said bank while it is the holder of this obligation, the net proceeds of the sale of the above securities may be applied either on this note, or on any of our liabilities or engagements held by said bank." The cashier testified that the bank was accustomed to discount the firm's notes and drafts on customers, some of which were indorsed by the father of one of the partners to aid his son in business; and that at the suggestion of the cashier, and for the sake of convenience, it was agreed that the $5,000 note indorsed by him should be deposited with the bank to secure credit for the firm, no other purpose being mentioned. Held, that it was given solely to obtain credit for the firm, and could not be held as security for a draft which it accepted in favor of another, and which was discounted by the bank on the latter's credit

Appeal from circuit court of city of Lynchburg.

Kirkpatrick & Blackford, for appellant.

B. G. H. Ke&n, for appellee.

Hinton, J. This case involves the right of the Lynchburg National Bank to enforce the security of a note for $5,000, made by A. D. Barnes & Co., on the 20th April, 1885, payable four months after date, and indorsed by William H. Loyd, for the payment of a draft for $435.15, drawn by one G. W. Smith upon and accepted by the aforesaid firm. And this right is claimed to arise by virtue of the terms and effect of a certain collateral note executed by the said firm of A. D. Barnes & Co. on the 22d June, 1885, which, it is supposed, makes the note for $5,000 a valid security for the draft. This collateral note is in the words and figures following: "Lynchburg, Va., June 22, 1885. $3,700. Thirty days after date, for value received, we promise to pay to the Lynchburg National Bank, of Lynchburg, Va., or order, at said bank, thirty-seven hundred dollars, homestead and 8.11 other exemptions waived, having deposited with said bank, as collateral security for the payment of this note, our note for five thousand dollars, ($5,000,) indorsed by W. H. Loyd, dated April 20th, 1885, and payable four months after that date; and we hereby promise to give at any time, on demand, such additional collaterals as may from time to time be required by its president or cashier. If these additional collaterals be not given when demanded, then this note to be due, and rebate of interest taken shall be allowed on payment prior to maturity; and we hereby give to said bank, its president or cashier, full power and authority to sell and assign and deliver the whole or any part of said collaterals, or any substitutes therefor, or any additions thereto, at public or private sale, at the option of the bank, or its president or its cashier, or either of them, on the non-performance of the above premises, or any of them, or at any time thereafter, and without advertising or giving to us any notice or making any demand of payment. It is also agreed that said collaterals may from time to time, by mutual consent, be exchanged for others, which shall also be held by said bank on the terms above set forth; and that if we shall come under any other liability, or enter into any other engagement, with said bank while it is the holder of this obligation, the net proceeds of the sale of the above securities may be applied either on this note or on any of our liabilities or engagements held by said bank, as its president or cashier may elect. A. D. Barnes & Co. "

At the trial the defendant, William H. Loyd, asked the court to give the following instruction: " If the jury believe from the evidence that the $5,000 note of A. D. Barnes & Co. was indorsed by Wm. H. Loyd for the purpose, and only for the purpose, of enabling A. D. Barnes & Co., of which firm his son...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Canal-Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Brewer
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 15, 1926
    ... ... Ency. of Law, page 194; 31 Cyc. 870; 29 ... Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, pages 125, 126; Meek v ... Perry, 36 Miss. 245; Elliott on Contracts, secs. 74 and ... 124; 2 Pomeroy on Equity (3 Ed.), sec. 907; 22 A. & E. Enc ... Law, 899-903 and note; 12 R. C. L. 305 et seq.; Jones v ... Loyd, 117 Ill. 597; Huddleston v. Henderson, ... 181 Ill.App. 184; Hill on Trustees, page 580; 27 A. & E. Enc ... Law, 460 ... In ... procuring the endorsement of another and the pledging of ... collateral to secure such endorsement, the pledgee must make ... a full disclosure of all ... ...
  • Hornsby v. Knorpp
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 7, 1921
    ... ...          (1) ... Under the collateral agreement attached to the notes given by ... O. M. Munroe to the Broadway Bank, the defendants, as the ... successors and assigns of the Broadway Bank, had a perfect ... right to apply the proceeds, in excess of the amount due ... Gillet v. Bank of America, 160 N.Y. 549, 55 N.E ... 292; Hathaway v. Fall River Bank, 131 Mass. 14; Loyd ... v. Lynchburg National Bank, 86 Va. 690; R. S. 1909, sec ...          ALLEN, ... P. J. Becker, J., concurs. Daues, J., not sitting ... ...
  • Beavers v. Le Sueur
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1939
    ... ... LeSueur is now the ... owner.' Paragraph 14 amended paragraph 11 of the petition ... by alleging that LeSueur had made to the Federal Land Bank of ... Columbia a security deed on a described tract of 800 acres, ... more or less, which, in addition to other deeds including the ... one made ... 759; ... Mandeville Mills v. Milam, 39 Ga.App. 768, 148 S.E ... 418; Gillet v. Bank of America, 160 N.Y. 549, 55 ... N.E. 292; Loyd v. Lynchburg National Bank, 86 Va ... 690, 11 S.E. 104; First National Bank v. Illinois Trust & ... Savings Bank, C.C., 84 F. 34; Brown v ... ...
  • Easley v. First Nat. Bank Of Lynchburg
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • January 9, 1939
    ...held that the agreement constituted "an absolute pledge or mortgage of the securities for other notes and claims." In Loyd v. Lynchburg Nat. Bank, 86 Va. 690, 11 S.E. 104, this court reached the same conclusion. In that case A. D. Barnes & Company executed and delivered to the Lynchburg Nat......
  • Get Started for Free