Lozano v. Meyers
Decision Date | 28 June 1929 |
Docket Number | (No. 1257-5284.) |
Citation | 18 S.W.2d 588 |
Parties | LOZANO et ux. v. MEYERS et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
E. T. Yates, of Brownsville, for plaintiffs in error.
Myrick & Coursey, of Harlingen, for defendants in error.
This suit was brought by G. M. Lozano and wife against E. J. Meyers, W. R. Mulhausen, R. W. Mulhausen, and A. G. Purdy, seeking to cancel two promissory notes and a purported mechanic's lien, on account of failure of the consideration for which the notes were executed. The notes were executed by Lozano on May 10, 1927, one for $45,000, and the other for $2,000. Purdy, by cross-action, claimed to be holder of the $2,000 note in due course, and sought recovery thereon. The case was tried before the court without a jury.
Judgment was rendered in favor of the Lozanos, canceling the $45,000 note and the mechanic's lien. Personal judgment was rendered against Lozano in favor of Purdy for the amount due on the $2,000 note. Lozano and wife appealed from this part of the judgment. No complaint is made by any of the parties as to that portion of the judgment which canceled the mechanic's lien and the $45,000 note. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 8 S.W.(2d) 785.
The trial court expressly found the following facts:
The "builder's contract," referred to in the above findings of fact as having been signed and acknowledged by Lozano and wife, reads as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Continental Nat. Bank of Fort Worth v. Conner
...make the note and contract a single non-negotiable instrument, when the note itself is otherwise in negotiable form. Lozano v. Meyers, Tex.Com.App., 18 S.W. 2d 588; West v. First Baptist Church of Taft, 123 Tex. 388, 71 S.W.2d Doubtless what the Court of Civil Appeals intended to hold was t......
-
Carter v. South Texas Lumber Co.
...more than a statement of the transaction which gave rise to the note within the meaning of Section 3 of Article 5932. In Lozano v. Meyers (Tex.Com.App.), 18 S.W.2d 588, the reference in a note was to a mechanic's lien contract substantially as follows: that the note was given in part paymen......
- Masterson v. Harris County Houston Ship Channel Navigation Dist.