Lucas v. Southern Ry. Co.

Decision Date08 February 1899
Citation122 Ala. 529,25 So. 219
PartiesLUCAS v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Bibb county; John Moore, Judge.

Action by James Lucas against the Southern Railway Company. Upon the introduction of all the evidence, the court, at the request of the defendant, gave the general affirmative charge in its behalf, and to the giving of this charge the plaintiff duly excepted. There were verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals, and assigns as error the rulings of the trial court to which exceptions were reserved. Affirmed.

J. M McMaster and W. S. Carry, for appellant.

Smith &amp Weatherly and Edward S. Lyman, for appellee.

TYSON J.

The complaint in this case avers that plaintiff contracted with defendant to transport and deliver the corpse of his infant child from Blocton, Ala., to Aldridge, Ala., both being stations on the defendant's line of road; that he paid the price of transportation charged, and defendant accepted said corpse for transportation; that the contract of affreightment was effectuated by the purchase of a passenger ticket for said corpse; that defendant negligently and carelessly failed to carry the said body to Aldridge, but left it at a station some six miles distant from Aldridge. The complaint further avers that, in consequence of this negligence, the funeral of said infant was delayed, and plaintiff was "sorely vexed and harassed, and suffered great mental pain and anguish, and was compelled to prolong his stay from his business, to wit, two days, to his special damage," etc. The undisputed evidence, as shown by the record, is that one G. B. Lucas, a kinsman of the plaintiff was in charge of the corpse, and purchased the tickets for its transportation and the transportation of three other persons, the plaintiff being one of them, who were accompanying the remains. The record affirmatively discloses that plaintiff was not present when the tickets were purchased, and never had them in his possession; that G. B Lucas delivered all the tickets to the conductor of the train, telling him that one was for the corpse, which was put in the caboose of the mixed train, and transferred at Gurnee Junction to the baggage car of the regular passenger train; and, further, that the only information imparted by G. B. Lucas to defendant's agent when he purchased the tickets was that one of them was for a "corpse," which ticket the agent identified by writing the word "corpse" upon it. The evidence further shows that plaintiff gave the money to G. B. Lucas to pay for all the tickets purchased by him, and G. B. Lucas testified that he was acting for the plaintiff in the purchase of the tickets; but it is nowhere shown that this was disclosed or known to the agent when he sold the tickets. On the contrary, the agent testified that he did not know that the "corpse" was the body of plaintiff's child; that there were three families by the name of Lucas living in Blocton, and that he knew that an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Deavors v. Southern Express Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 21, 1917
    ... ... allegation had corresponded with the proof, a recovery might ... have been had as for that item--that is, provided other ... allegations and proof had been sufficient. There was ... therefore a failure of proof as to the allegation that ... plaintiff paid the costs of transportation. Lucas v ... Southern Ry. Co., 122 Ala. 529, 25 So. 219. While this ... case has been overruled on the point that an undisclosed ... principal cannot sue on a contract made by his agent, it has ... not been overruled as to failure of proof or as to variance ... See Manker's Case, 137 Ala. 292, 34 ... ...
  • Sullivan v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 29, 1901
    ...are supported in Schmaltz v. Avery, 16 Q. B. 655; Darrow v. Produce Co. (C. C.) 57 F. 463; 97 Mass. 303, 93 Am. Dec. 93; Lucas v. Railroad Co. (Ala.) 25 So. 219; Partn. 367, and authorities cited in note; 2 Bates, Partn. § 1020. The authorities relied upon by appellant and cited in brief ar......
  • Manker v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 18, 1902
    ...cases of Daughtery, Henderson, Kennon & Bro., and Wilson, supra, upon this question, should be disapproved, and the cases of Allgood and Lucas supra, should be overruled. follows from this conclusion that the court below erred in those portions of the general charge excepted to wherein the ......
  • Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Williams
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • November 30, 1911
    ... ... The evidence ... supports this contention, and appellee had a right to ... maintain this suit in his own name. The case of Lucas v ... Railroad Company, 122 Ala. 529, 25 So. 219, which ... announced a contrary doctrine, was expressly overruled by the ... Supreme Court, in ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT