Lucio v. United States

Decision Date09 May 1968
Docket NumberNo. 25672.,25672.
Citation394 F.2d 511
PartiesGustavo LUCIO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Gustavo Lucio, pro se.

Ralph H. Harris, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ernest Morgan, U.S. Atty., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant's post-conviction motion to vacate his federal court sentence for violation of the narcotics laws is predicated upon the sole ground that a disparity between his sentence and that of a co-defendant amounted to a violation of his rights under the due process and equal protection clauses of the Constitution of the United States.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury under two counts and received an eight year sentence on each count, to run concurrently. His co-defendant, an eighteen year old girl, pleaded guilty to one count and received a sentence under the Youth Corrections Act. She was subject to parole, 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b), while he was not, 26 U.S.C. § 7237(d).

The trial court had the duty to consider the character, background and extent of participation of each defendant in the transaction, and to treat them as individuals in arriving at a decision as to just sentences. The appellant is in no position to make his co-defendant's sentence a basis for complaint that his constitutional rights were violated.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Granville v. U.S., 78-2151
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • March 10, 1980
    ...participants in the bank robbery received somewhat lesser sentences does not make Granville's sentence excessive. Lucio v. United States, 394 F.2d 511 (5th Cir. 1968). The second alleged reason that the sentence was excessive was similarly rejected by the District Court. Granville claims th......
  • Wilkinson v. State, 75-232
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 12, 1975
    ...prejudice of the trial judge is just that: an assertion, with no factual support in the record. Cole v. State, supra; Lucio v. United States, 5th Cir. 1968, 394 F.2d 511; Baker v. United States, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 1069; Hart v. Henderson, 5th Cir. 1971, 449 F.2d A review of the jury ch......
  • Hart v. Henderson, 71-1299 Summary Calendar.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 1, 1971
    ...v. United States, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 1069; see also Rodriguez v. United States, 5th Cir. 1968, 394 F.2d 825; Lucio v. United States, 5th Cir. 1968, 394 F.2d 511. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment as to this II Appellant's claim to credit on his sentence for jail time......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT