LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CAL.
| Decision Date | 18 May 1964 |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
377 U.S. 215
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD JUDICIAL
Decided May 18, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 219 Cal. App. 2d 710, 33 Cal. Rptr. 544.
Hart H. Spiegel and John Hays for appellant.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and John J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd.
... Page 890 ... 85 Cal.Rptr. 890 ... 6 Cal.App.3d 149 ... MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, ated, Plaintiff and Appellant, ... FRANCHISE TAX BOARD of the State of California, Defendant and Respondent ... Civ. 26105 ... 823, 66 S.Ct. 1378, 90 L.Ed. 1603; and Luckenbach S.S. Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (1963) 219 Cal.App.2d 710, 720, 33 ... ...
-
Stutey v. Mitchell (In re Mitchell)
... ... Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court, 219 Cal. App. 2d 817 (1963), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, ... ...
-
SINCLAIR v. BAKER
... ... Reported below: 219 Cal. App. 2d 817, 33 Cal. Rptr. 522. PER CURIAM. The appeal ... ...