Luckett v. Warden, Nevada State Prison
| Decision Date | 30 October 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 8453,8453 |
| Citation | Luckett v. Warden, Nevada State Prison, 541 P.2d 910, 91 Nev. 681 (Nev. 1975) |
| Parties | Frank LUCKETT, Appellant, v. WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON, Respondent. |
| Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
On January 8, 1974, a jury found Frank Luckett guilty of grand larceny, a felony.Thereafter, on February 8, 1974, he was sentenced to a six year term in the Nevada State Prison.His belated in pro per appeal from the judgment of conviction was dismissed--for want of jurisdiction--on April 19, 1974, by an unpublished order in case No. 7688.
Some six (6) months later, in October 1974, Luckett, seeking to obtain his release from confinement, petitioned for habeas corpus (post-conviction) relief in the First Judicial District, Carson City.An order denying the requested relief was entered in December 1974, and the timely appeal from that order was affirmed by this court.SeeLuckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. ---, 539 P.2d 1219(filed Sept. 8, 1975).
On February 10, 1975, while his appeal from the adverse order of the First Judicial District Court was in progress, Luckett filed another petition for post-conviction relief, this time in the Second Judicial District, Washoe County.Relief was denied and Luckett has now lodged this, his third, appeal.
From the record, and the above recitations, we, sua sponte, conclude that briefing and hearing is...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. West
...U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 1987, 95 L.Ed.2d 826 (1987); Darnell v. State, 98 Nev. 518, 520-21, 654 P.2d 1009, 1011 (1982); Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1077, 96 S.Ct. 864, 47 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976); State v. Gilliham, 86 N.M. 439, 440, 524 P.2d 1335, 1......
-
Nolan v. State
...we conclude that appellant is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975). Our review of the amended judgment of conviction for district court case number C188025(2), however, reveals a clerica......
-
Lapena v. Grigas
... ... -RFB-NJK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA May 11, 2015 ORDER Introduction This action is a petition ... 1-2. 2 In its 1998 opinion, reversing the state district court's judgment granting LaPena post-conviction ... of Costanza by Detective Lee; (c) contents of a prison interview between Weakland and Detective Lee, and an ... ...
-
Meegan v. State
...NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).2 The court also affirmatively stated during the plea colloquy that it would sentence appellant to life with a possibili......