Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Civ. 70-24S.

CourtUnited States District Courts. 8th Circuit. United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. District of South Dakota
Writing for the CourtNICHOL
Citation325 F. Supp. 1330
PartiesLarry LUKE, Individually, Larry Luke, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Lisa Luke, Deceased, and Kathleen Luke, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
Docket NumberCiv. 70-24S.
Decision Date29 April 1971

325 F. Supp. 1330

Larry LUKE, Individually, Larry Luke, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Lisa Luke, Deceased, and Kathleen Luke, Plaintiffs,
v.
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

Civ. 70-24S.

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, S. D.

April 29, 1971.


325 F. Supp. 1331

Gerald L. Reade, of Brady, Kabeiseman, Light & Reade, Yankton, S. D., for plaintiffs.

John B. Shultz, of Woods, Fuller, Shultz & Smith, Sioux Falls, S. D., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

NICHOL, Chief Judge.

This action is now before this court on cross-motions by the several parties for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs as assignees of the alleged insured, Herbert Carl Llewellyn, and under S.D.C.L. Sec. 58-23-1 (1967), seek to recover damages from the defendant in the amount of state court judgments totaling $138,840.12 obtained against Llewellyn plus costs, interest on the judgments and attorneys' fees for this action. The action is based on defendant's insurance policy no. 40-054467 issued by defendant to Llewellyn. The plaintiffs allege that defendant unjustifiably denied coverage under the policy, wrongfully refused to defend, and negligently and in bad faith refused to settle within the policy limits. Federal jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 (1964).

POLICY COVERAGE

The material facts relating to the issue of policy coverage on the 1967 Pontiac owned by Llewellyn and which was involved in the accident out of which the state court judgments arose are not in dispute. That plaintiffs have a direct cause of action for damages up to the policy limits pursuant to S.D.C.L. Sec. 58-23-1 (1967) is admitted by defendant in its answer. The question determinative of policy coverage is: Did defendant at the time Llewellyn acquired ownership of the 1967 Pontiac involved in the accident insure, under the liability coverage of the policy, all automobiles owned by the named insured? If the defendant did insure all such automobiles on the date in question, the 1967 Pontiac was covered under the "automatic insurance" provisions of the policy.1

325 F. Supp. 1332

At all times material to this action defendant insured under the policy in question a 1966 Pontiac owned by Llewellyn. On October 15, 1966, he purchased a 1959 Oldsmobile from Wilson Motor Company, Sioux City, Iowa, while he was working and living in Sioux City on a temporary basis. Llewellyn operated the 1959 Oldsmobile until on or about January 15, 1967, without obtaining liability insurance on it.

On or about the 15th of January, 1967, the 1959 Oldsmobile became disabled with engine trouble. Llewellyn contacted Anderson, an employee of Wilson Motor, and together they towed the 1959 Oldsmobile to Wilson Motor's place of business. On the morning of the following day, January 16, 1967, Llewellyn unsuccessfully attempted to purchase a different automobile from Wilson Motor. Later the same day Llewellyn purchased the 1967 Pontiac from Souder's Pontiac in Sioux City, Iowa. On February 4, 1967, Llewellyn while driving the 1967 Pontiac was involved in an accident with an automobile occupied by the plaintiffs and their deceased daughter, Lisa Luke.

After a thorough investigation into the facts of the accident and the facts relating to the ownership of the 1959 Oldsmobile and the 1967 Pontiac, the defendant denied coverage on the 1967 Pontiac on the basis that it did not qualify as an "owned" automobile under the terms of the insurance contract.

The insurance contract in question was entered into in South Dakota. Since no intent on the part of the parties to be bound by the law of some other place has been shown, the policy must be construed in accordance with South Dakota law. American Service Mutual Ins. Co. v. Bottum, 371 F.2d 6, 8-9 (8th Cir. 1967); Briggs v. United Services Life Ins. Co., 80 S.D. 26, 117 N.W.2d 804, 806-807 (1962). Under South Dakota law when an automobile insurance policy is susceptible to two constructions, one favorable and one unfavorable to the insurer, the construction which is against the insurer must be adopted. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. of New York, 80 S.D. 541, 128 N.W.2d 111 (1964); Sunshine Mut. Ins. Co. v. Addy, 73 S.D. 595, 47 N.W.2d 285 (1951).

The 1959 Oldsmobile was purchased, licensed and titled in Iowa. This court agrees with the defendant that under Iowa law Llewellyn owned the 1959 Oldsmobile at the time the 1967 Pontiac was acquired. Llewellyn was the registered owner at the time in question and could have obtained possession of the 1959 Oldsmobile by paying Wilson Motor the balance of the purchase price plus costs of storage and towing. ICA § 321.45 (2); Calhoun v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co., 255 Iowa 1375, 125 N.W.2d 121 (1963); Varvaris v. Varvaris, 255 Iowa 800, 124 N.W.2d 163 (1963). It remains to be determined, however, whether the 1959 Oldsmobile was at that time an automobile owned by the named insured within the meaning of the applicable policy provisions.

The South Dakota Supreme Court has not yet ruled on the meaning of "owned automobile" in such a context. This court finds that the South Dakota Supreme Court would hold that the phrase "all private passenger and utility automobiles owned by the name insured" contained in this policy "does not contemplate a vehicle which is in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 practice notes
  • Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co. v. Keeley, Docket No. 81566
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Michigan
    • 19 Octubre 1989
    ...91 S.Ct. 64, 27 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970), reh. den. 400 U.S. 985, 91 S.Ct. 364, 27 L.Ed.2d 397 (1970); Luke v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co., 325 F.Supp. 1330 (D.S.D.1971), judgment aff'd. in part and rev'd in part 476 F.2d 1015 (CA 8, 1973) (under South Dakota law, an insurance company may cond......
  • Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 71-1348
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • 2 Noviembre 1972
    ...moved for summary judgment. The trial court found that coverage existed but refused to allow damages in excess of the policy limits. 325 F.Supp. 1330 (D.S.D.1971). Cross appeals followed. The insurance carrier contests the finding of coverage, and the plaintiffs appeal from the denial of th......
  • Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 68-C-162.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. Western District of Wisconsin
    • 29 Diciembre 1972
    ...819 (5th Cir. 1970); State Farm Mutual Ins. Co. v. Skaggs, 251 F.2d 356, 359 (10th Cir. 1957); Luke v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co., 325 F.Supp. 1330, 1333 (D.S.D.1971); Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Hawkins, 292 F.Supp. 947, 952 (S.D.Iowa Because of the uncertainty on the record as to the circu......
  • Rodriguez v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 43602
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 18 Diciembre 1981
    ...insurance policy, the matter has been adjudicated in several other jurisdictions. Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 325 F.Supp. 1330 (D.S.D.1971), aff'd 476 F.2d 1015 (8th Cir. 1972); Manns v. Indiana Lum. Mut. Ins. Co. of Indianapolis, 482 S.W.2d 557 (Tenn.App.1971); Lamber......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co. v. Keeley, Docket No. 81566
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Michigan
    • 19 Octubre 1989
    ...91 S.Ct. 64, 27 L.Ed.2d 64 (1970), reh. den. 400 U.S. 985, 91 S.Ct. 364, 27 L.Ed.2d 397 (1970); Luke v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co., 325 F.Supp. 1330 (D.S.D.1971), judgment aff'd. in part and rev'd in part 476 F.2d 1015 (CA 8, 1973) (under South Dakota law, an insurance company may cond......
  • Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 71-1348
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • 2 Noviembre 1972
    ...moved for summary judgment. The trial court found that coverage existed but refused to allow damages in excess of the policy limits. 325 F.Supp. 1330 (D.S.D.1971). Cross appeals followed. The insurance carrier contests the finding of coverage, and the plaintiffs appeal from the denial of th......
  • Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 68-C-162.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. Western District of Wisconsin
    • 29 Diciembre 1972
    ...819 (5th Cir. 1970); State Farm Mutual Ins. Co. v. Skaggs, 251 F.2d 356, 359 (10th Cir. 1957); Luke v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co., 325 F.Supp. 1330, 1333 (D.S.D.1971); Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Hawkins, 292 F.Supp. 947, 952 (S.D.Iowa Because of the uncertainty on the record as to the circu......
  • Rodriguez v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 43602
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 18 Diciembre 1981
    ...insurance policy, the matter has been adjudicated in several other jurisdictions. Luke v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 325 F.Supp. 1330 (D.S.D.1971), aff'd 476 F.2d 1015 (8th Cir. 1972); Manns v. Indiana Lum. Mut. Ins. Co. of Indianapolis, 482 S.W.2d 557 (Tenn.App.1971); Lamber......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT