Luna v. Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee, Inc.
| Decision Date | 30 December 1993 |
| Citation | 631 So.2d 917 |
| Parties | Terry LUNA v. DOMINION BANK OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE, INC., et al. 1921190. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Robert H. Ford and Basil Timothy Case of The Ford Law Firm, Birmingham, for appellant.
F. Michael Haney of Inzer, Stivender, Haney & Johnson, P.A., Gadsden, for appellees.
This case arises from Terry Luna's assertion that Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee, Inc. ("Dominion"), failed to distribute certain loan proceeds to which he claims he was entitled. Luna filed this lawsuit 18 months after he had been discharged from his debts in bankruptcy proceedings. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Dominion, Union National Bank ("Union"), and Johnny Baugh.
In applying the doctrine of judicial estoppel this Court considers the relationship between the litigant and the judicial system. The doctrine applies to preclude a party from assuming a position in a legal proceeding inconsistent with a position previously asserted. Selma Foundry & Supply Co. v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co., 598 So.2d 844 (Ala.1992). Further, it has been specifically held that a debtor in bankruptcy must disclose any litigation likely to arise in a nonbankruptcy contest. Selma Foundry, supra, citing Monroe County Oil Co. v. Amoco Oil Co., 75 B.R. 158 (S.D.Ind.1987).
Luna asserts that Johnny Baugh, a loan officer for Union National Bank, agreed to lend Luna $92,000 to develop a trailer park. Luna claims that he took separate installments of the money of $10,000 and $60,000. However, Luna contends that when he returned to the bank for the remaining loan proceeds, he discovered that Union had been sold to Dominion and that Baugh no longer worked there. Luna states that, although he needed only $8,000 of the remaining $22,000 of the loan, Dominion refused to extend the $8,000 he needed to complete his trailer park. Luna defaulted on his loan payments, and Dominion foreclosed on Luna's property.
Luna then filed for bankruptcy. Luna listed Dominion as a creditor in his debtors' statement and admitted in the statement that he owed Dominion $90,000. 1 Luna was discharged from his debts under Chapter Seven of the Bankruptcy Code on March 25, 1991. Luna had not disclosed his claim against Baugh or Dominion as a potential asset in any of the documents he executed during his bankruptcy proceedings.
Eighteen months after his bankruptcy discharge, Luna filed this lawsuit, on September 17, 1992, against Dominion, Union, and Johnny Baugh, alleging breach of contract, fraud, and negligent and wanton supervision. Baugh, Union, and Dominion denied any oral contract or misrepresentation and contended that Luna was estopped from asserting his claims. The trial court entered a summary judgment for Baugh, Union, and Dominion.
The doctrine of judicial estoppel applies, where a debtor in bankruptcy proceedings fails to disclose any claim that may be presented in a nonbankruptcy contest, to estop the debtor from presenting the claim. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey Bank, 848 F.2d 414 (3d Cir.1988), citing Monroe, supra. In the Oneida case, Oneida Motor Freight sued United Jersey Bank, alleging fraud and other causes of action, seven months after the conclusion of its bankruptcy proceedings. Oneida had not disclosed any claim against United Jersey Bank during the bankruptcy proceedings. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Oneida's action as barred under...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Tippins
...bankruptcy proceedings as at least a contingent asset. Bertrand v. Handley, 646 So.2d 16, 18 (Ala. 1994); Luna v. Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee, Inc., 631 So.2d 917 (Ala.1993). In each of these cases, the court granted a non-creditor defendant a summary judgment based upon the debtor-pl......
-
Middleton v. Caterpillar Indus., Inc.
...failure to list the action as an asset in the bankruptcy schedules. This Court first addressed the issue in Luna v. Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee, Inc., 631 So.2d 917 (Ala.1993). In Luna, a discharged Chapter 7 debtor sued Dominion Bank 18 months after he was discharged, alleging breach......
-
Dupwe v. Wallace
...which required a response in the form of proof from the Nixes for purposes of avoiding summary judgment. See Luna v. Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee, 631 So.2d 917 (Ala.1993). Clearly, the Nixes knew or should of known they had a cause of action against the appellees for lender-liability ......
-
Brassfield v. Jack McLendon Furniture, Inc.
...estopped from asserting her claims, Bodden relies heavily on the Alabama Supreme Court's decision in Luna v. Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee, Inc., 631 So.2d 917 (Ala.1993). However, Luna is factually distinct from the instant case in two important respects. In Luna, the debtor wanted to ......