Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co.
| Decision Date | 25 April 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 04-8838.,04-8838. |
| Citation | 544 U.S. 997 |
| Parties | LUNDAHL v. ELI LILLY & CO. ET AL. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Nelson v. Mountain W. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.
...(D. Utah July 8, 2004) (general order imposing filing restrictions);3. The United States Supreme Court; Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co., 544 U.S. 997, 125 S.Ct. 1940, 161 L.Ed.2d 771 (2005) ;4. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Johnson v. Stock, No. 03–4219, 2005 WL 1349963 (10th Cir. June 8, ......
-
Lundahl v. Nar Inc., 4:05 CV 00127 RCT.
...fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and [the] petition [is] submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1." Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co., 544 U.S. 997, 997, 125 S.Ct. 1940, 161 L.Ed.2d 771 (2005). The United States Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits have also imposed pre-filing restri......
-
Lundahl v. Mel Hoffman, L. A. Home-Owners Aid, Inc., 4:16CV3000
... ... Plaintiff Holli Lundahl2 has a lengthy history of filingPage 3 frivolous actions. In fact, multiple other courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have placed filing restrictions on Ms. Lundahl. See Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co., 544 U.S. 997 (2005) ("As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee ... is paid"); Lundahl v. Nar Inc., 434 F. Supp.2d 855 (D. Idaho 2006) (enjoining ... ...
-
Lundahl v. Stephen Dunn, Dustin Smith, Jeff Semrad, Dixie Hubbard, Jaime De Anda, Oneida Cnty., U.S. Bank, Law Offices of Merrill & Merrill, Kimberley Johnson, Detective Schwartz, Doug Williams, David Nye, Craig Christensen, First Am. Title Ins. Co., 4:15CV3133
... ... Plaintiff Holli Telford1 has a lengthy history of filingPage 3 frivolous actions in federal courts. In fact, multiple other courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have placed filing restrictions on Ms. Telford. See Lundahl v. Eli Lilly & Co., 544 U.S. 997 (2005) ("As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee ... is paid"); Lundahl v. Nar Inc., 434 F. Supp.2d 855 (D. Idaho 2006) (enjoining ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results