Lupfer v. State

Docket Number109/10
Decision Date20 June 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
25 cases
  • Leidig v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • August 5, 2021
    ...provision are only persuasive authority with respect to the similar Maryland provision.See also, e.g. , Lupfer v. State , 420 Md. 111, 130, 21 A.3d 1080 (2011) ("Not inconsistent then with the phrase, ‘in pari materia ,’ we have interpreted Maryland's privilege against self-incrimination to......
  • Harris v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • April 12, 2018
    ...error to allow Detective Gaskins to testify that Mr. Harris had requested counsel during a custodial interview. See Lupfer v. State , 420 Md. 111, 119–20, 21 A.3d 1080 (2011). In light of the fact that we are reversing the convictions in this case for other reasons, we need not decide wheth......
  • Derr v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • August 22, 2013
    ...under the applicable Maryland authorities, that tax violates the State's equal protection guarantee.” In Lupfer v. State, 420 Md. 111, 129–130, 21 A.3d 1080, 1091 (2011), concerning the right against self-incrimination, Judge Harrell for the Court stated (citations and footnote omitted): “A......
  • Derr v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • August 22, 2013
    ...under the applicable Maryland authorities, that tax violates the State's equal protection guarantee." In Lupfer v. State, 420 Md. 111, 129-130, 21 A.3d 1080, 1091 (2011), concerning the right against self-incrimination, Judge Harrell for the Court stated (citations and footnote omitted): "A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Related Evidentiary Issues
    • United States
    • Maryland State Bar Association Warnken's Maryland Criminal Procedure (MSBA) Chapter 14 Fifth Amendment Remedies
    • Invalid date
    ...App. 669, 677-78 (1990). E. Impeachment of the defendant by silence is permissible if the defendant "opens the door" In Lupfer v. State, 420 Md. 111 (2011), the Court of Appeals held that the use of the defendant's post-arrest, post-Miranda silence to rebut the implication that the defendan......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT