Lyft, Inc. v. City of Seattle
| Docket Number | 94026-6 |
| Decision Date | 31 May 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
46 cases
-
Wash. Pub. Emps. Ass'n v. Wash. State Ctr. for Childhood Deafness & Hearing
Loss
...into the [PRA] other statutes which exempt or prohibit disclosure of specific information or records.’ " Lyft, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 190 Wash.2d 769, 778, 418 P.3d 102 (2018) (quoting PAWS, 125 Wash.2d at 261-62, 884 P.2d 592 (citing former RCW 42.17.260(1) (1992), recodified as RCW 42.5......
-
Doe v. Pierce Cnty.
... ... Williams IV, Law Office of Harry Williams LLC, 707 E Harrison St., Seattle, WA, 98102-5410, Amy Irene Muth, Law Office of Amy Muth, PLLC, 1111 3rd ... Puget Sound Energy, Inc. , 176 Wash.2d 909, 922, 296 P.3d 860 (2013) (quoting Qwest Corp. v ... Servs., Inc. v. City of Lakewood , 178 Wash.2d 635, 310 P.3d 804 (2013) ). "We review the ... ]he party seeking to prevent disclosure has the burden of proof.’ " Lyft, Inc. v. City of Seattle , 190 Wash.2d 769, 418 P.3d 102, 113-14 (2018) ... ...
-
Wash. Election Integrity Coal. United v. Schumacher
...of provisions in Title 29A RCW that have authorized disclosure of some election records, but not ballots.6. The Supreme Court's decision in Lyft is inapposite¶42 WEiCU argues that Lyft, Inc. v. City of Seattle , 190 Wash.2d 769, 418 P.3d 102 (2018), holds that superior courts may not "circu......
-
Green v. Pierce Cnty.
...whether such an injunction could be granted in this instance is not at issue here). RCW 42.56.540 ; see Lyft, Inc. v. City of Seattle , 190 Wash.2d 769, 796, 418 P.3d 102 (2018) (providing the injunction standard). Perhaps most importantly, however, this interpretation follows the intent of......
Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...P.2d 801 (1978): 22.6(4) Lowy v. PeaceHealth, 174 Wn.2d 769, 280 P.3d 1078 (2012): 11.5(3) Lyft, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 190 Wn.2d 769, 418 P.3d 102 (2018): Ch. 1, 7.2, 7.3(4), 7.4, 13.4, 13.5, 15.2, 16.4, 17.2(2)(b), 17.3(2) M_______________________________________________________________......
-
Legal Tools for Achieving Low Traffic Zones
...e.g. , City & County of San Francisco v. Uber Techs., Inc., 36 Cal. App. 5th 66, 76 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019); Lyft, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 190 Wash. 2d 769 (Wash. 2018); Rasier, LLC v. New Orleans, 222 So. 3d 806, 813 (La. Ct. App. 2017); City of Columbus v. Lyft, Inc., 22 N.E.3d 304 (Frankli......
-
§7.3 Other Rules of Construction
...of a conflict between the Act and other statutes, the provisions of the [PRA] govern.'" Lyft Inc. v. City of Seattle, 190 Wn.2d 769, 778, 418 P.3d 102 (2018) (quoting PAWS II, 125 Wn.2d at 251-52); see also Worthington v. WestNET, 182 Wn.2d 500, 341 P.3d 995 (2015) (a multijurisdictional ta......
-
§7.2 Golden Rule of Construction
...Washington residents informed and in control over the instruments they have created." Lyft Inc. v. City of Seattle, 190 Wn.2d 769, 779, 418 P.3d 102 (2018). This strong policy of transparency is rooted in Initiative 276, approved by voters in 1972. RCW 42.17A.001. Initiative 276 continues t......
Get Started for Free
