Lynch v. Bor. Of Hillsdale .
| Decision Date | 13 May 1948 |
| Docket Number | No. 27.,27. |
| Citation | 137 N.J.L. 280,59 A.2d 622 |
| Parties | John LYNCH et al., Respondents, v. BOROUGH OF HILLSDALE et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Samuel J. Davidson, of Hoboken, for appellant Borough of hillsdale.
Charles W. Weleck, of Hackensack (Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs and George A. Brown, all of Hackensack, of counsel), for respondents.
The judgment under review herein, 136 N.J.L., 129, 54 A.2d 723, is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices BODINE, DONGES, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, and BURLING and Judges WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN and SCHETTINO-11.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
28 cases
-
Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment of City of Newark
...action guided by the same standards. Lynch v. Borough of Hillsdale, 136 N.J.L. 129, 54 A.2d 723 (Sup.Ct.1947), affirmed 137 N.J.L. 280, 59 A.2d 622 (E. & A. 1948). Under subsection (b), unlike subsection (c), the local legislative agency may, by ordinance, define the category of special exc......
-
Ward v. Scott
...v. Board of Adjustment of Newark, cited supra; Lynch v. Hillsdale, 136 N.J.L. 129, 54 A.2d 723 (Sup.Ct.1947), affirmed 137 N.J.L. 280, 59 A.2d 622 (E. & A.1948). Even the local legislative body itself may not arbitrarily convert the use of a single lot from residence to business. Linden Met......
-
Jantausch v. Borough of Verona
...applicable to direct review. Lynch v. Borough of Hillsdale, 136 N.J.L. 129, 54 A.2d 723 (Sup.Ct.1947), affirmed o.b. 137 N.J.L. 280, 59 A.2d 622 (E. & A. 1948); V. F. Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Summit, 8 N.J. 386, 86 A.2d 127 (1952) Garrou v. Teane......
-
Tillberg v. Kearny Tp.
...A.2d 429) the Dickinson, Home Fuel Oil and Lynch v. Borough of Hillsdale, 136 N.J.L. 129, 54 A.2d 723 (Sup.Ct.1947), aff'd 137 N.J.L. 280, 59 A.2d 622 (E. & A. 1948) opinions all emphasize the undue speed and implicit bad faith with which the landowners in those zoning cases incurred obliga......
Request a trial to view additional results