Lyon v. Arndt

CourtAlabama Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtANDERSON, J.
CitationLyon v. Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242 (Ala. 1905)
Decision Date10 January 1905
PartiesLYON v. ARNDT.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Mobile County; Thomas H. Smith Chancellor.

Suit by Emily C. Lyon against George C. Arndt. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals. Affirmed.

The bill was filed under the statute authorizing the filing of bills in chancery to quiet title, and to determine claims for real estate. In the bill the complainant averred that she was in the actual, peaceable possession of the lands described claiming to own and did own the same. The other averments of the bill were in substantial compliance with the statute. The respondent, in his answer, denied that the complainant owned the lands or was in peaceable possession of them before the institution of the suit, and averred that at the time of the institution of the suit the complainant's title and right to possession were disputed. The evidence introduced was in irreconcilable conflict; the testimony for the complainant tending to show that her agent had built a one-room house on the lands before the institution of the suit, and that timber had been cut from the land under her authority, while the testimony for the defendant tended to show that he purchased the lands after the institution of the suit, and that his grantors and those through whom he claimed had been in peaceable possession of the lands for many years. On the final submission of the cause upon the pleadings and proof the chancellor decreed that the complainant was not entitled to relief, and ordered the bill dismissed; he reciting in his opinion that the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Chestang v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1960
    ...237 Ala. 218, 186 So. 153; Kinney v. Steiner Bros., 167 Ala. 494, 52 So. 593; Holland v. Coleman, 162 Ala. 462, 50 So. 128; Lyon v. Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242. 'It is also clear that to constitute a contested, disputed or scrambling possession, it is not necessary that the possession o......
  • Carr v. Moore
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 15, 1919
    ... ... Johnson v. Johnson, 147 Ala. 543, 41 So. 522; ... Foy v. Barr, 145 Ala. 244, 39 So. 578; Randle v ... Daughdrill, 142 Ala. 490, 39 So. 162; Lyon v ... Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242; Cooper v ... Cooper, 78 So. 383 ... Complainants, showing title to the land, were in the ... ...
  • Continental Trust Co. v. Tallassee Falls Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • March 25, 1915
    ... ... and claims to real estate, or as an effort to remove a ... specific cloud from its title. ' Citing Lyon v ... Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242, and other cases ... That ... opinion concludes: ... 'The ... decree appealed from is ... ...
  • Watson v. Baker
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 26, 1934
    ...The rule indicated in Hicks v. Stone, supra, is the rule that obtains, notwithstanding the expressions in the earlier cases. Lyon v. Arndt, 142 Ala. 486, 38 So. 242; Randle v. Daughdrill, 142 Ala. 490, 39 So. Carr v. Moore, 203 Ala. 223, 82 So. 473. The purpose of this appeal appears to be ......
  • Get Started for Free