Lyon v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan Railroad Co.

Decision Date13 April 1875
Citation31 Mich. 429
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesAlbert M. Lyon v. The Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan Railroad Company

Submitted on Briefs April 7, 1875.

Error to Superior Court of Detroit.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Chipman, Dewey & Hawes, for plaintiff in error.

G. V. N. Lothrop, for defendant in error.

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff was employed as an engineer in running one of the passenger trains of the defendant in error, and on the evening of November 23d, 1871, and when a switch near the Grand Trunk Junction was misplaced, ran his train off upon a side track and against cars which were standing there, and received an injury for which he brought suit against the company. Under the ruling of the court, the jury returned a verdict against him.

The evidence conclusively showed, that in managing and running the train at the time, he disregarded the instructions which the company had issued for his guidance, and was therein guilty of gross negligence which directly conduced to the injury complained of. There is also much room for saying that his accident was within the risks he assumed by entering into the employment.

Upon the facts as shown by the record, the result was correct, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Matthews v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 31, 1910
    ... ... 420; ... Lockwood v. Railroad, 55 Wis. 50; Lyon v ... Railroad, 31 Mich. 429.] ... ...
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Blaylock
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 29, 1915
    ...himself, he would be excused in law for violating the rule unless the violation of it was negligent. 110 Mo. 387; 86 Ga. 15; 66 Me. 420; 31 Mich. 429; 85 240; 83 Ark. 428; 80 Ga. 427. Davis & Pace, for appellee. 1. The motion to dismiss was properly overruled, and Jackson and Jones were not......
  • Finnegan v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1914
    ...v. Railroad, 75 Md. 297; Foss v. Railroad, 170 Mass. 168; Benage v. Railroad, 102 Mich. 72; Karrer v. Railroad, 76 Mich. 400; Lyon v. Railroad, 31 Mich. 429; White v. Railroad, 72 Mich. 12; Railroad v. Rush, 71 Miss. 987; Gorham v. Railroad, 113 Mo. 408; Zumwalt v. Railroad, 35 Mo.App. 661;......
  • Konold v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • April 21, 1900
    ... ... the road. Railroad Co. v. Mothershed, 20 So. (Ala.), ... Michigan Bank v. Eldred, 9 Wall., 544; Equitable ... 88, 89; ... Wolsey v. Lake Shore R. R. Co. , 33 Ohio St ... 227; Crew v. St Louis K. & N.W ... Co. , 20 F. 87; Lyon v. Detroit, etc., ... R. R. Co. , 31 Mich ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT