Lyon v. Lash

Decision Date08 December 1906
Docket Number14,767
Citation88 P. 262,74 Kan. 745
PartiesMELINDA V. LYON v. GOLDIE E. LASH
CourtKansas Supreme Court

Decided July, 1906.

Error from Sedgwick district court; THOMAS C. WILSON, judge.

Judgment affirmed.

SYLLABUS

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.

LIBEL--Defamatory Letter--Publication. Where a person writes a defamatory letter and sends it in a sealed envelope, through the United States mail, to the person defamed thereby, who receives it and reads the contents thereof to a third person, such reading will not constitute a publication of the libel by the writer thereof for the purposes of a civil action.

Adams & Adams, for plaintiff in error.

John D Davis, for defendant in error

GRAVES J. All the Justices concurring.

OPINION

GRAVES, J.:

This action was commenced in the district court of Sedgwick county for the purpose of recovering damages on account of an alleged libel. The defendant filed a general demurrer to the petition, which was sustained. The plaintiff stood upon her pleading, and judgment was entered against her for costs. To reverse the ruling she brings the case here for review. The libelous matter complained of is contained in a letter which reads:

"I write to tell you we got home the 2 day of march with the horses all safe and well. We was 12 days comeing from boise city up hear threw snow and mud part of the way the mud was hub deep to the wagon and snow the other part we came over seven feet of snow on the divide of the big mountain I told you about we have four feet of snow here on our ranch now we got our steer calf drowned while george was gone to boise to meet me everything els was all right the horses stood the trip all rite and air looking fine and now in regard to the land we think we will not undo what the dead has done in grandfather will he says this in so much as I never helped my son William I give to him the home farm and I no much as my father loved his mother if she had needed that land he would have deeded it to her, why he loved his father and mother so well he deserted his wife and children to live near them, and if you had a showed me everything and not tried to keep some things hid as you did for instance the box of tools under the bed where I slept and the whip the fly nets and many other things that was my own property then you may talk to me about a parser and when you send me a draft on some bank for five thousand dollars you can have a deed to that land you kept everything hid from me that you could you never told me that your mother had released her dowery rite to that land did you I found that out after I came hear if you had told me everything I should have done something for you I want you to turn over to the probate court the money you got from charley herman for fathers cook stove and that vice and I want you to sell that lumber and shingles and corn you have of mine and every thing you have and turn the money over to the probate court and if you dont do this I shall take steps to compel you to do so I love my grandmother but have no love for you melinda and if my grandmother wants to come and live with me I will come after her but as for you you can hoe your own way if you cant make a living on that land you have got you can work in some ladies kitchen for your living as I have had to do and I want you to write and tell me what agreement you made with charley herman about the rent of that 80 ackers of land this year for that land belongs to me and if you do not tell me I will find out.

GOLDIE E. LASH."

The extrinsic circumstances explanatory of the language used in the letter, as nearly as they can be gathered from the allegations of the petition and the letter itself, are substantially, that W. H. Lyon died, leaving an estate; Elmina Lyon is his widow, Melinda V. Lyon his daughter, and the defendant the daughter of his son William. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Lunz v. Neuman, 33271
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 1, 1955
    ...is not published by the communication thereof to the defamed person alone. 3 Restatement, Torts, 192, § 577, comment b; Lyon v. Lash, 1906, 74 Kan. 745, 747, 88 P. 262. If respondent's statements in his applications for employment contained defamatory information, the publication of the def......
  • Buckwalter v. Gossow
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1907
    ... ... Moon , 64 Vt. 450, 24 A. 244, 15 L. R. A. 760, 33 Am ... St. Rep. 936.) ... We have ... adopted the rule as above stated. (Lyon v. Lash, 74 ... Kan. 745, 88 P. 262.) But this is not the rule in criminal ... prosecutions for libel, where the gravamen of the offense is ... as ... ...
  • State v. Lund
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • May 8, 1909
    ...for such publication as is the natural and probable consequence of his own act (25 Cyc. 430; 18 A. & E. Encycl. of L. 1018; Lyon v. Lash, 74 Kan. 745, 88 P. 262), and it may conceded that the defendant was not bound to anticipate that a husband would exhibit such a letter to his wife. But g......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT