Lyons v. City of Los Angeles, s. 80-6078
Decision Date | 11 September 1981 |
Docket Number | 81-5023,Nos. 80-6078,s. 80-6078 |
Citation | 656 F.2d 417 |
Parties | Adolph LYONS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Doe Crupi, Doe Hills, Doe Sandoval and Doe Lloyd, Defendants-Appellants. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Lewis N. Unger, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants.
Michael R. Mitchell, Woodland Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before GOODWIN, HUG and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Adolph Lyons in 1977 commenced a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Los Angeles, seeking damages, injunctive relief and declaratory relief. After an appeal to this court 1 had restored two counts of the complaint that had been dismissed by a partial summary judgment, Lyons obtained a preliminary injunction which forbids police officers to use carotid artery or bar arm strangleholds under circumstances that do not threaten death or great bodily harm to the officer. Both sides appeal.
This court will not disturb an order granting a preliminary injunction unless it was an abuse of discretion by the district court. Miss Universe, Inc. v. Flesher 605 F.2d 1130, 1133-34 (9th Cir.1979); Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Com'n v. Nat. Football, 634 F.2d 1197, 1200-01 (9th Cir.1980). All the trial judge has done, so far, is to tell the city that its police officers may not apply life threatening strangleholds to persons stopped in routine police work unless the application of such force is necessary to prevent serious bodily harm to an officer. This relatively innocuous interference by the judiciary with police practice can hardly be characterized as an abuse of discretion when the record reveals that nine suspects who have been stopped by the police and who have been subdued by the use of carotid and bar arm control holds have subsequently died, allegedly of the injuries sustained in the application of these holds. Cf. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 379, 96 S.Ct. 598, 608, 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1976) ( ).
Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment issues were briefed and argued by Lyons on cross-appeal in an understandable search for an advisory opinion pending the resumption of what...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Los Angeles v. Lyons
...in the administration of the State's criminal laws in the absence of irreparable injury which is both great and immediate. Pp. 1670-1671. 656 F.2d 417, Frederick N. Merkin, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Michael R. Mitchell, Woodland Hills, Cal., for respondent. Justice WHITE delivered ......
-
Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith
...F.2d 1243, 1246 & n.5 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 934, 101 S.Ct. 333, 66 L.Ed.2d 158 (1980), aff'g preliminary injunction, 656 F.2d 417 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 102 S.Ct. 1426, 71 L.Ed.2d 647 (1982). However, because each doctrine addresses itself to specific and......
-
Portland Police Ass'n v. City of Portland By and Through Bureau of Police
...in Lyons II, the allegations of injuries were specific, non-remote, and capable of precise judicial evaluation. Lyons v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 417, 418 (9th Cir. 1981). That record provided the "definite prejudicial interferences" required by United Pub. Workers of Am. The case befo......
-
C & C Products, Inc. v. Messick, 81-7973
...of Los Angeles, 615 F.2d 1243 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 934, 101 S.Ct. 333, 66 L.Ed.2d 158 (1980), appeal after remand, 656 F.2d 417 (9th Cir.), stay granted, 453 U.S. 1308, 102 S.Ct. 14, 69 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1981), cert. granted, 455 U.S. 937, 102 S.Ct. 1426, 71 L.Ed.2d 647 The fact t......
-
Gutting Bivens: How the Supreme Court Shielded Federal Officials from Constitutional Litigation.
...City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 99-100 (1983) (reversing the 3-0 decision of the lower court: Lyons v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 417 (9th Cir. 1981)); Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 364 (1978) (reversing the 3-0 decision of the lower court: Sparkman v. McFarlin, 552 F.2d 17......
-
Judicial restraints on illegal state violence: Israel and the United States.
...standing. (37.) Id. at 97, 112-13. (38.) Id. at 98. (39.) Id. at 99. (40.) Id. (41.) Id. at 100. (42.) Lyons v. City of Los Angeles, 656 F.2d 417 (9th Cir. 1981) (per curiam). The court found no abuse of discretion and described the preliminary injunction as relatively innocuous interferenc......