M.B. v. Schuylkill Cnty.
Decision Date | 21 March 2019 |
Docket Number | CIVIL ACTION No. 18-756 |
Parties | M.B., a Minor, Plaintiff, v. SCHUYLKILL COUNTY et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Gregory S. Spizer, Anapol Weiss, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.
Frank L. Tamulonis, Jr., Lieberman, Tamulonis & Hobbs, Pottsville, PA, for Defendants Schuylkill County, Marcia Hoke.
Frank R. Emmerich, Jr., Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC, Andrew Kabnick Garden, Conrad O'Brien, PC, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants Kidspeace, Kidspeace National Centers, Inc., Kidspeace Corporation, Kelsey O'Hara, Heather Moore, Cori Ruszkowski.
Robert J. O'Brien, Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC, Philadelphia, PA, Jenna M. Kraycer, Joseph A. O'Brien, Michael J. O'Brien, Oliver Price & Rhodes, Clarks Summit, PA, for Defendant Catholic Social Services of The Diocese of Scranton, Inc.
Jenna M. Kraycer, Joseph A. O'Brien, Michael J. O'Brien, Oliver Price & Rhodes, Clarks Summit, PA, Robert J. O'Brien, Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant Geneva Mathuse.
This case involves alarming facts. The Court's immediate task, however, is not to evaluate the seriousness of the allegations, but rather to test their sufficiency. As set forth below, the Court grants in some parts and denies in other parts the various defendants' motions to dismiss.1
The Schuylkill County Defendants move to dismiss all § 1983 claims against them as well as the prayer for punitive damages against Marcia Hoke. The Court grants in part and denies in part the motion, such that it will grant the request to dismiss the punitive damages claim against Ms. Hoke in her official capacity only.
The CSS Defendants move to dismiss the § 1983 claims and negligence and vicarious liability claims against them. The Court grants the motion, and all claims against the CSS Defendants are therefore dismissed.
The KidsPeace Defendants move to dismiss the § 1983 claims, negligent misrepresentation claims, and negligence per se claims against them. The Court grants in part and denies in part the motion, such that the § 1983 claims are dismissed against all of the KidsPeace Defendants.
Plaintiff M.B. is a developmentally and emotionally disabled child. Since September 15, 2014, M.B. and her biological brother have been in the custody and care of K.B. and P.B. K.B. and P.B. formally adopted M.B. and her brother on February 1, 2017, and K.B. and P.B. have been the legal parents and guardians of both children since that time.
In May 2017, K.B. and P.B. registered as foster parents with KidsPeace, a Pennsylvania-based foster care organization. Shortly thereafter, KidsPeace employee Cori Ruszkowski contacted K.B. and P.B. about potentially placing an 11-year-old boy, J.W., in K.B. and P.B.'s care. At that time, J.W. was in the custody of Schuylkill County Children & Youth Services ("SCCYS"), which is an agency of Schuylkill County. Although K.B. and P.B. "were not looking to foster a child of [J.W.'s] age," Ms. Ruszkowski assured K.B. and P.B. that "J.W. acted younger than his biological age and that he posed no risk, sexual or otherwise, to [K.B. and P.B.'s] minor children," including M.B. Amended Compl. ¶ 33. At least one employee from SCCYS would later echo that sentiment.
On or around May 18, 2017, K.B. and P.B. spoke with Ms. Ruszkowski about J.W.'s history. Ms. Ruszkowski reaffirmed that J.W. did not have a history of sexual abuse, molestation, or past behavioral issues that might cause problems at K.B. and P.B.'s home. K.B. and P.B. were only told that J.W. had one "minor incident" in his prior home, in which he "turned over a table." Id. ¶ 35.
On or around May 22, 2017, K.B. and P.B. met with J.W. for the first time, at Lehigh Valley Hospital. The meeting and a medical exam did not raise any red flags with K.B. and P.B., and so they agreed to foster J.W. After that meeting, Ms. Ruszkowski text messaged K.B. that J.W. had "been through the ringer," id. ¶ 36, but did not explain what she meant by that.
A few days later, on or around May 25, 2017, Ms. Ruszkowski and Marcia Hoke—a case worker at SCCYS—"transported [J.W.] for placement" in K.B. and P.B.'s home. Id. ¶ 37. At that time, "K.B. inquired again to Defendants Hoke and Ruszkowski whether J.W. had ever been molested, had a sexual assault history with others or had other troubling or concerning behaviors." Id. Ms. Ruszkowski and Ms. Hoke each "categorically denied that J.W. had any sexual assault, molestation or troubling behavioral history or that he posed a risk to [M.B.] or her family." Id.
At the time of J.W.'s placement, K.B. and P.B. requested, but did not receive, (1) a copy of J.W.'s "background materials," and (2) a family service plan. Id. ¶ 38. K.B. and P.B. appear to have been entitled to several categories of information about J.W.:
While K.B. and P.B. were fostering J.W., several incidents with him occurred:
Neither KidsPeace, SCCYS, CSS, nor any of their employees, took action to remove J.W. from K.B.'s and P.B.'s custody after these incidents or in light of the subsequent...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
OpenPeak, Inc. v. Gittleman (In re OpenPeak, Inc.)
...at 1323). 167. Milo, LLC v. Procaccino, No. CV 16-5759, 2020 WL 1853499, at *10 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2020) (citing M.B. v. Schuylkill Cty., 375 F.Supp.3d 574, 587 (E.D. Pa. 2019) (quoting Bartol, 251 F. Supp. 3d at 860)). 168. ECF No. 37-1 at 20-21. 169. ECF No. 47 at 55-57. 170. Id. 171. Bar......
-
Forman v. Gittleman (In re OpenPeak, Inc.)
...1323). 167. Milo, LLC v. Procaccino, No. CV 16-5759, 2020 WL 1853499, at *10 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2020) (citing M.B. v. Schuylkill Cty., 375 F.Supp.3d 574, 587 (E.D. Pa. 2019) (quoting Bartol, 251 F. Supp. 3d at 860)). 168. ECF No. 37-1 at 20-21. 169. ECF No. 47 at 55-57. 170. Id. 171. Bartol......
-
Hisey v. QualTek USA, LLC
...¶¶ 31-34. "Shotgun" style allegations like this have been criticized by this Court as insufficient. See M.B. v. Schuylkill Cty., 375 F. Supp. 3d 574, 586 (E.D. Pa. 2019) (describing as shotgun pleading "a complaint that asserts multiple claims against multiple defendants without specifying ......
-
Bostic v. Ethicon Inc.
... ... Pa. 2017) (alterations in original) (quoting Weiland v ... Palm Beach Cnty. Sheriff's Off. , 792 F.3d 1313, ... 1321-23 (11th Cir. 2015)). “The ‘unifying ... alteration in original) (quoting M.B. v. Schuylkill ... Cnty. , 375 F.Supp.3d 574, 587 (E.D. Pa. 2019)) ... Defendants ... ...