M. D. Wells & Co. v. Robb

Decision Date08 February 1890
Citation43 Kan. 201,23 P. 148
CourtKansas Supreme Court
PartiesM. D. WELLS & COMPANY v. C. M. ROBB et al

Error from Lyon District Court.

M. D Wells & Company commenced an action against C. M. Robb et al., before a justice of the peace of Lyon county, on the 5th day of May, 1887. The following is a copy of the bill of particulars, omitting title:

"Plaintiffs allege that they are now and for more than six years last past have been copartners, doing business as M. D. Wells & Co.; that the defendants, and others, whose names are to these plaintiffs unknown, are and for more than six years last past have been members of a society or association known as 'The Ivy Grange;' that the Lyon County Cooperative Association is now and for more than six years last past has been a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the general laws of the state of Kansas; that the said 'Ivv Grange' subscribed to, and became and still is the owner of, twenty shares of five dollars each of the capital stock of said The Lyon County Cooperative Association; that on the 20th day of November, 1884, in the district court of Lyon county, Kansas, in an action therein pending wherein the plaintiffs herein were plaintiffs and the said Lyon County Cooperative Association was defendant, said plaintiffs duly recovered a judgment against said defendant therein in the sum of $ 1,583; that an execution has been issued upon said judgment to the sheriff of Lyon county, and by him returned unsatisfied; that said judgment is still unpaid; that on the 25th day of November, 1884, said Ivy Grange was duly served with a notice of such judgment, and that execution would be ordered against the shareholders in said Lyon County Cooperative Association.

"Wherefore plaintiffs demand judgment against the defendants and each of them in the sum of $ 100."

A judgment was rendered in the justice's court in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants. An appeal was taken to the district court, and the case was tried there at the February term, 1888, upon the following agreed statement of facts:

"It is agreed that this case shall be submitted to the court upon the following agreed statement of facts: That the plaintiffs on the 20th day of November, 1884, obtained a judgment in the sum of $ 1,500 in the district court of Lyon county, Kansas against the Lyon County Cooperative Association, which was a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Kansas that on the 27th day of October, 1884, defendants W. L McLaughlin & Co. and Samuel Bliss each obtained a separate judgment against said company or corporation in a justice's court in the county of Lyon for the sum of $ 47.75, and $ 85.25, respectively; that the other defendants were each members of a society or association known as 'The Ivy Grange,' an unincorporated society organized for social purposes, its members being generally known as 'grangers;' that F. H. Lyon was also a member of said grange, and during the year 1884 was its master, and presided at the meetings of the grange, and had the usual powers of a presiding officer; that said grange during the year 1884 owned twenty shares of the capital stock of the Lyon County Cooperative Association, of the face value of five dollars per share; that in November, 1884, executions were issued upon the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and upon the judgments in favor of the defendants McLaughlin & Co. and Samuel Bliss, against the said Lyon County Cooperative Association, and each of said executions was returned wholly unsatisfied; that thereafterward, and in the year 1884, and after the return of the execution on the judgment in favor of plaintiffs unsatisfied, the plaintiffs caused a written notice to be served upon said Ivy Grange by delivering the same to F. H. Lyon, of which the following is a true copy, save and except the title of cause omitted, and the names of the parties to whom it was addressed omitted; but that included in the names of the parties to whom said notice was addressed, among whom was the Ivy Grange and others, stockholders of the Lyon County Cooperative Association, to wit:

"'You and each of you will take notice that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled cause of action did, on the 20th day of November, 1884, at the September, 1884, term of said district court, by the consideration of said court recover a judgment against the defendant, The Lyon County Cooperative Association, for the sum of $ 1,583, damages, and the costs of the action, taxed at $ 10.75; that an execution has been issued upon said judgment to the sheriff of Lyon county, Kansas, and by him returned wholly unsatisfied, there having been no property belonging to defendant in said action found whereon to levy such execution. Now this is to notify each one of you who are hereinbefore named, that on Tuesday, the 3d day of March, 1885, at the hour of 10 o'clock A. M. on said day, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, plaintiffs will, at the court house in the city of Emporia, in open court, move the district court of Lyon county, state of Kansas, for an order ordering an execution to be issued upon such judgment against each person hereinbefore named, to an amount equal to the amount of stock owned by such person in the Lyon County Cooperative Association at the date of said judgment as appears from the books of said association. The above-named persons are further notified, that they can save all costs by paying to the clerk of the district court an amount equal to the amount of stock so held by them, to be applied in satisfaction of said judgment.'

"That thereafterward, and at the March, 1885, term of said district court, an order was entered upon said motion, and upon proof of service of the same upon the presiding officer of the said Ivy Grange, that an execution issued on the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Lyon County Cooperative Association, against the said Ivy Grange, for the amount of one hundred dollars, and the costs in said motion; which said execution was issued, and returned wholly unsatisfied; that in April, 1887, defendants W. L. McLaughlin & Co. and Samuel Bliss each served a notice on each of the above-named defendants other than themselves, a copy of which said notice so served by McLaughlin & Co. upon Elza Moore and others was and is as follows, to wit:

"'To Mr. Elza Moore et al.: You are hereby notified that on the 30th day of April, 1887, at o'clock -- M., a motion will be made by the undersigned as attorneys for W. L. McLaughlin & Co., before E. N. Evans, justice of the peace of Emporia city, Lyon county, Kansas, at his office in Emporia, for an order against you that you pay the sum of one hundred dollars, the amount of the capital stock you hold in the Lyon County Cooperative Association as member of the Ivy Grange; the same being to satisfy a judgment rendered by said justice of the peace, in which the said W. L. McLaughlin & Co. were plaintiffs and the said Lyon County Cooperative Association was defendant.'

"That the notice served on behalf of Samuel Bliss was precisely the same, except the name of Samuel Bliss was substituted for the name of W. L. McLaughlin & Co.; that said notice was served in April, 1887; that on the 5th day of May, 1887, the plaintiffs commenced this action, and that on the 12th day of May, 1887, the plaintiffs obtained before said justice of the peace judgment against each of said defendants, except the said McLaughlin & Co. and said Bliss, for the sum of $...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Hancock Nat. Bank v. Ellis
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • September 23, 1898
    ...the official reports of the following decisions of the courts of Kansas: Howell v. Manglesdorf, 33 Kan. 194, 5 P. 759; Wells v. Robb, 43 Kan. 201, 23 P. 148; Abbey v. Dry-Goods Co., 44 Kan. 415, 24 P. Abbey v. Long, 44 Kan. 688, 24 P. 1111; Plumb v. Bank, 48 Kan. 484, 29 P. 699; Hoyt v. Bun......
  • Hancock Nat. Bank v. Ellis
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • September 23, 1898
    ...the official reports of the following decisions of the courts of Kansas: Howell v. Manglesdorf, 33 Kan. 194, 5 Pac. 759;Wells v. Robb, 43 Kan. 201, 23 Pac. 148;Abbey v. Dry–Goods Co., 44 Kan. 415, 24 Pac. 426;Abbey v. Long, 44 Kan. 688, 24 Pac. 1111;Plumb v. Bank, 48 Kan. 484, 29 Pac. 699;H......
  • Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Carlton
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • June 23, 1911
    ...... on that stockholder's liability which could not be. affected by proceedings of another creditor. Wells v. Robb, 43 Kan. 201, 23 P. 148. A Kansas stockholder who. had been sued by a creditor to enforce his statutory. liability could not subsequently ......
  • Kulp v. Fleming
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • December 3, 1901
    ...pleaded in the petition, and found in the following decided cases, viz.; Howell v. Manglesdorf, 33 Kan. 199,5 Pac. 759;Wells v. Robb, 43 Kan. 201, 23 Pac. 148;Abbey v. Dry Goods Co., 44 Kan. 415, 24 Pac. 426;Ball v. Reese, 58 Kan. 614, 50 Pac. 875,62 Am. St. Rep. 638;Woodworth v. Bowles, 61......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT