MA Delivery Ass'n v. Coakley
| Docket Number | 11-1441 |
| Decision Date | 20 January 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
95 cases
-
Equal Means Equal v. Ferriero
...that organizations may have interests of their own, separate and apart from the interests of their members." Mass. Delivery Ass'n v. Coakley, 671 F.3d 33, 44 n.7 (1st Cir. 2012). Organizational standing is analyzed under the same inquiry as individual standing. That is to say, for an organi......
-
Ayala v. Wong
...dissent's suggestion to the contrary is without merit. See discussion supra at Pages 961–63 & n. 15. 1.See Massachusetts Delivery Ass'n v. Coakley, 671 F.3d 33, 48 (1st Cir.2012) (reiterating that “[s]tate courts are not bound by the dictates of the lower federal courts, although they are f......
-
Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular De P.R.
...a district court may not weigh evidence in deciding a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). See Massachusetts Delivery Ass'n v. Coakley , 671 F.3d 33, 39 n. 6 (2012) (emphasizing that a primary difference between a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) is that,......
-
Ortiz v. De San Juan
...district court may not weigh evidence in deciding a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). See Massachusetts Delivery Ass'n v. Coakley, 671 F.3d 33, 39 n. 6 (1st Cir. 2012) (emphasizing that a primary difference between a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) is......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
De facto class actions? Plaintiff- and defendant-oriented injunctions in voting rights, election law, and other constitutional cases.
...law could proceed in federal court despite pending state-level prosecutions against other people. See, e.g., Mass. Delivery Ass'n v. Coakley, 671 F.3d 33, 43-44 (1st Cir. 2012); Women's Servs., P.C. v. Douglas, 653 F.2d 355, 35859 (8th Cir. 1981). (101.) Prof'l Ass'n of Coll. Educators, TST......