Maccormack v. State Department of Health
| Decision Date | 18 June 1928 |
| Citation | 142 A. 477,108 Conn. 83 |
| Parties | WILLIAM D. MACCORMACK v. THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL. SAMUEL POSNER v. THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL. RAYMIND C. PRISQUE v. THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL. |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, New Haven County; Earnest C. Simpson, Judge.
William F. D. Kilpatrick, of Bridgeport, for appellants MacCormack, Posner, and Prisque.
James W. Carpenter, of Hartford, Benjamin W. Alling, Atty. Gen., and Cyril Coleman and J. H. Bartholomew, Jr., both of Hartford, for appellees.
Argued before MALTBIE, HAINES, HINMAN, BANKS, and WOLFE, JJ.
Each of these appellants appeals from a judgment of the superior court sustaining the revocation of his license to practice medicine by the state department of health under circumstances identical in all material respects with those involved in Mower v. State Department of Health, 142 A. 473. The issues raised are determined adversely to the appellants by our decision in that case.
There is no error in any of these appeals.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Lentine v. State Board of Health
...prove "bad moral character." Mower v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 74; Lerner v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 82; Posner v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 83. Proof does not have to be beyond a reasonable doubt. 9120, R. S. 1929; State v. Brown, 245 N.W. 348. (5) On review, action......
-
State ex rel. Lentine v. State Board of Health
...prove "bad moral character." Mower v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 74; Lerner v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 82; Posner v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 83. Proof does not have to be beyond a reasonable doubt. Sec. 9120, R.S. 1929; State v. Brown, 245 N.W. 348. (5) On review, ac......