Maccormack v. State Department of Health

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM.
Citation142 A. 477,108 Conn. 83
PartiesWILLIAM D. MACCORMACK v. THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL. SAMUEL POSNER v. THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL. RAYMIND C. PRISQUE v. THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL.
Decision Date18 June 1928

142 A. 477

108 Conn. 83

WILLIAM D. MACCORMACK
v.

THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL.

SAMUEL POSNER
v.
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL.

RAYMIND C. PRISQUE
v.

THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ET AL.

Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut.

June 18, 1928


Appeal from Superior Court, New Haven County; Earnest C. Simpson, Judge.

William F. D. Kilpatrick, of Bridgeport, for appellants MacCormack, Posner, and Prisque.

James W. Carpenter, of Hartford, Benjamin W. Alling, Atty. Gen., and Cyril Coleman and J. H. Bartholomew, Jr., both of Hartford, for appellees.

Argued before MALTBIE, HAINES, HINMAN, BANKS, and WOLFE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Each of these appellants appeals from a judgment of the superior court sustaining the revocation of his license to practice medicine by the state department of health under circumstances identical in all material respects with those involved in Mower v. State Department of Health, 142 A. 473. The issues raised are determined adversely to the appellants by our decision in that case.

There is no error in any of these appeals.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • State ex rel. Lentine v. State Board of Health, No. 31168.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • December 6, 1933
    ...character." Mower v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 74; Lerner v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 82; Posner v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 83. Proof does not have to be beyond a reasonable doubt. Sec. 9120, R.S. 1929; State v. Brown, 245 N.W. 348. (5) On review, action of Board of ......
1 cases
  • State ex rel. Lentine v. State Board of Health, No. 31168.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • December 6, 1933
    ...character." Mower v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 74; Lerner v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 82; Posner v. State Dept. of Health, 108 Conn. 83. Proof does not have to be beyond a reasonable doubt. Sec. 9120, R.S. 1929; State v. Brown, 245 N.W. 348. (5) On review, action of Board of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT