Mackenzie v. Schorr

• Decision Date: 09 June 1926
• Docket Number: 12.
• Citation: 133 A. 821,151 Md. 1
• Parties: MACKENZIE ET AL. v. SCHORR.
• Court: Maryland Court of Appeals

133 A. 821

151 Md. 1

MACKENZIE ET AL. v. SCHORR.

No. 12.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

June 9, 1926

Appeal from Superior Court of Baltimore City.

"To be officially reported."

Suit by Thomas Mackenzie and another, receivers for the Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, against John G. Schorr. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before BOND, C.J., and URNER, OFFUTT, DIGGES, PARKE, and WALSH, JJ.

Thomas Mackenzie and James Steele, both of Baltimore (J. Wallace Bryan, of Baltimore, on the brief), for appellants.

William H. Lawrence and Joseph T. Molz, both of Baltimore, for appellee.

DIGGES J.

On November 7, 1924, Thomas Mackenzie and J. Wallace Bryan were by the circuit court of Baltimore City duly appointed receivers for the Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, an insolvent corporation. By leave of the circuit court of Baltimore City, these receivers instituted suit in the superior court of Baltimore City against the defendant (appellee here), John G. Schorr, on the 8th day of December 1925, by filing therein the following declaration:

"Thomas Mackenzie and J. Wallace Bryan, receivers, by authority of the circuit court of Baltimore City, first had and obtained by Thomas Mackenzie, J. Wallace Bryan, and James Steele, their attorneys, sue John G. Schorr.

For that the Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, a corporation of the state of Maryland, heretofore doing business in the city of Baltimore, was in financial straits and in need of ready money to conduct its said business, all of which was well known to the defendant, who was familiar with its financial condition.

That in order to acquire for himself a one-fourth capital stock interest in said corporation, he on or about the 8th day of November, 1923, agreed with Clarence R. Bye, Augustus Werner, W. W. Waltemeyer, and George W. Johnson, who were all of the stockholders of the said Satin Candy Company Incorporated, that upon their arranging for him to acquire the one-fourth interest in the capital stock of the said Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, which was owned by one Augustus Werner, he would pay the sum of $1,250 for said shares of capital stock, and upon his election to the board of directors and to the office of treasurer and secretary of the said Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, in the place of the said Augustus Werner, he would furnish the said Satin Candy Company, when so elected, a sum of money in such installments as might be agreed upon, and as might be convenient for him, not to exceed in the aggregate the sum of $5,000, all of which, however, should be paid to the said Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, within thirty (30) days from his election as aforesaid, the said John G. Schorr to accept the promissory note or notes of the Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, for said advances payable within 12 months from their respective dates, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent., the same to be indorsed by the said Clarence R. Bye, W. W. Waltemeyer, and George W. Johnson. All of said money was to be applied to the liquidation of the then indebtedness of the Satin Candy Company, as directed by its board of directors, excepting as to the claim of Steuart & Co., which was to be protected by the said Satin Candy Company.

That in consideration of said advances and to further secure the said John G. Schorr against loss, the said Clarence R Bye agreed to convey to the said John G. Schorr the equity of redemption in a certain fee-simple residence property known as No. 4002 Main street, Baltimore, Md., owned by him and his wife, Mary E. Bye, and to procure his said wife to unite in said assignment.

That in accordance with said agreement the said shares of capital stock held by said Augustus Werner were procured for the defendant at the price named, to wit, $1,250, for which the said John G. Schorr, the defendant, paid, and the said shares of stock were transferred and directed to be delivered to the said defendant.

That the said defendant thereupon was elected one of the directors of the said Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, and also was elected its treasurer and secretary in the place of the said Augustus Werner, and as such director and officer he attended at its place of business from day to day, and undertook to act for and in the name of the said corporation, announcing to certain of the creditors of the Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, that he was so connected with it and would or had put money into its treasury to meet its financial obligations, and would thereafter have charge of its financial matters.

That the defendant advanced to the said corporation, under the agreement aforesaid, certain sums of money, to wit, about $500, to meet some of its indebtedness, but contrary to his obligations under the agreement aforesaid, and in violation of his duty in the premises, refused to make other or further advances of cash to said corporation, to the amount for which he had obligated himself as aforesaid, notwithstanding the said corporation was ready and willing to issue to him its promissory notes therefor, with the indorsements aforesaid, and the said Clarence R. Bye was ready to assign unto the defendant the equity of redemption in the property hereinbefore referred to, in accordance with the terms of said agreement.

That in consequence of the default of the defendant in the performance of his agreement aforesaid, the said Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, was unable to proceed with its business, or to continue the same by the payment of its debts and obligations as they matured; whereupon proceedings were instituted by certain of its creditors for the appointment of receivers to wind up its business, because of its insolvency, and Thomas Mackenzie and J. Wallace Bryan were thereupon duly appointed such receivers, by the circuit court of Baltimore City, on the 7th day of November, 1924.

That the assets of the said corporation, the Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, will not be sufficient to pay in full all of its creditors, and these plaintiffs under the authority of the said circuit court of Baltimore City bring this action to recover from the defendant the money so due by him to the said corporation as afore said.

And the plaintiffs claim $10,000 damages.

Thomas Mackenzie,

J. Wallace Bryan,

James Steele,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs." To this declaration a demurrer was interposed by the defendant, which demurrer was sustained, and judgment on the demurrer for the defendant for costs was entered. From this judgment the appeal in this case was taken.

The single question presented by this appeal, therefore, is admitting the allegations of the declaration which are well pleaded to be true, have the plaintiffs (appellants here) a good cause of action against the defendant? It will be seen that the declaration alleges that the Satin Candy Company, Incorporated, was a corporation of the state of Maryland doing business in Baltimore City; that said corporation was in financial difficulties, and this condition was known to the appellee, who was also familiar with the need of the corporation for ready money to conduct its business; that the whole of the capital stock of the corporation was owned by Clarence R. Bye, Augustus Werner, W. W. Waltemeyer, and George W. Johnson; that these stockholders, as individuals, on or about the 8th of November, 1923, entered into an agreement with the appellee, by which agreement the appellee was to acquire a one-fourth stock interest in the corporation, for which he agreed to pay $1,250; that upon his...