Mackey v. Davis
Decision Date | 06 December 2019 |
Docket Number | 2180316 |
Citation | Mackey v. Davis, 297 So.3d 422 (Ala. Civ. App. 2019) |
Parties | Dr. Eric MACKEY, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Education v. Edward Clinton DAVIS |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
James R. Ward III, Montgomery, for appellant.
Clint Daughtrey and Victoria D. Relf, Alabama Education Association, Montgomery, for appellee.
Dr. Eric Mackey, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Education, appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in favor of Edward Clinton Davis.For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment of the circuit court and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
On June 29, 2016, the State of Alabama Department of Education("the Department") sent Davis, who had been employed as an educator by the Montgomery County Board of Education, a certified letter informing him that the Department proposed to take action to revoke and/or to nonrenew his Professional Educator Certificate ("the teaching certificate").The letter explained:
Davis requested an administrative hearing concerning the proposed action to revoke and/or to narrow his teaching certificate.A hearing was conducted before an administrative-law judge ("ALJ") on February 3, 2017.On April 17, 2017, the ALJ issued a document stating the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law, determining that Davis was "guilty of immoral, unbecoming, and indecent behavior rendering him unfit to teach" and recommending that Davis's teaching certificate be revoked and not renewed.
On September 13, 2017, Michael Sentance, who was then the State Superintendent of Education, sent a certified letter to Davis announcing his decision to accept the ALJ's recommendation to revoke and to nonrenew Davis's teaching certificate.Sentance wrote:
On the same day Sentance's decision to revoke and to nonrenew Davis's teaching certificate was issued, Sentance notified the State Board of Education of his intent to resign effective the following day.
On October 2, 2017, Davis filed an application for rehearing with the Department, which was denied by operation of law, and Davis timely filed his notice of appeal with the Department.On December 11, 2017, Davis timely filed in the circuit court his petition for judicial review of the decision to revoke and to nonrenew his teaching certificate, contending that the decision to revoke/nonrenew his teaching certificate was in error for two reasons.First, Davis contended that, pursuant to § 41-22-15,Ala. Code 1975, andBice v. Taylor, 157 So. 3d 161(Ala. Civ. App.2014), the State Superintendent of Education was required to have read and reviewed the entire administrative record before rendering a decision to revoke/nonrenew Davis's teaching certificate.Specifically, Davis questioned whether, given the timing of Sentance's resignation letter, Sentance had actually read the entire administrative record.Second, Davis contended that, because he had previously been acquitted of criminal-harassment charges arising from the alleged at-school inappropriate touching of T.H., the double-jeopardy provisions of the state and federal constitutions prohibited the Department from taking additional action against him based upon the same alleged conduct.
On April 3, 2018, Dr. Ed Richardson, in his capacity as the acting State Superintendent of Education, moved the circuit court for the entry of a summary judgment in favor of the Department.Richardson argued that the undisputed facts established that Sentance had indeed read and reviewed the entire administrative record before revoking and/or nonrenewing Davis's teaching certificate.Richardson also argued that double jeopardy had no application.In support of the motion, Richardson attached, amongst other exhibits, the affidavit of Sentance.In that affidavit, Sentance testified, in pertinent part:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
