Mackmasters v. State

Decision Date23 November 1902
CitationMackmasters v. State, 81 Miss. 374, 33 So. 2 (Miss. 1902)
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesSAMUEL MACKMASTERS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPI

October 1902

FROM the circuit court of Tishomingo county HON. EUGENE O. SYKES Judge.

Mackmasters appellant, was indicted and tried for the murder, October 27 1901, of his own father, Uriah Mackmasters, he was convicted of manslaughter, and appealed to the supreme court. The facts upon which the decision turned are sufficiently apparent from the opinion of the court.

Reversed and remanded.

L. E. Sawyer and E. S. Candler, for appellant.

William Williams, assistant attorney general, for appellee.

Argued orally by E. S. Candler, Jr., for appellant, and by William Williams, assistant attorney-general, for appellee.

OPINION

CALHOON, J.

Appellant was indicted for the murder of his own father, and convicted of manslaughter. He was sentenced to imprisonment for forty years, which is practically equivalent to conviction of murder with direction of the jury to imprison him for life. Whether the homicide was manslaughter or justifiable in self-defense is, in our view of the record, a close question on the testimony of the witnesses and on the physical facts. The jury determined it to be manslaughter, and their conclusion would not be disturbed without error of law. But the mere fact that the question of guilt is so close, and the penalty so grave, make it quite important that the trial should be free from serious error of law.

If general violence of demeanor and vindictiveness of disposition authorized conviction of felonious homicide, it appears from this record that the deceased in his lifetime was, and the accused and others of the family are, in continual jeopardy. David Mackmasters, brother of the defendant, was...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Alabama & Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Thornhill
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 22, 1913
    ... ... diminish the probabilities of an act having been done or not ... done, which act is the subject of contest.' 1873, ... SARGENT, C. J., in State v. Railroad, 52 N.H. 528, ... 532: 'It would seem to be axiomatic that a man is likely ... to do or not to do a thing, or to do it or not to do it ... ...
  • De Angelo v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 11, 1939
    ...735, 54 So. 251; Hardy v. State, 167 Miss. 150, 148 So. 627; George v. State, 39 Miss. 570; Newcomb v. State, 37 Miss. 383; McMasters v. State, 81 Miss. 374, 33 So. 2; Upchurch v. State, 81 Miss. 374, 51 So. Rouse v. State, 107 Miss. 427, 65 So. 501; Prewitt v. State, 126 So. 824, 156 Miss.......
  • Fisher v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 15, 1926
  • State v. Roberts
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • April 10, 1915
    ... ... because it only related to Mullins' attitude towards King ... in the summer of 1910 while the murder of King did not occur ... until September, 1912. Cases are cited to show that evidence ... of threats made four or five years before the homicide was ... too remote. ( Mackmasters v. State, 81 Miss. 374, 33 ... So. 2.) We observe from the record that Pickering's ... testimony was not objected to at the trial and it would be ... too late to challenge its competency for the first time here ... But Pickering's evidence was competent and admissible ... 8. It ... ...
  • Get Started for Free