Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 6 Div. 203
Decision Date | 12 April 1951 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 203 |
Citation | 52 So.2d 166,255 Ala. 440 |
Parties | MADDOX v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
W. L. Longshore, of Birmingham, for petitioner.
Chas. H. Brown, of Birmingham, for appellee.
This is a petition by Troupe Maddox for certiorari to the Court of Appeals, to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Maddox v. City of Birmingham, Ala.App., 52 So.2d 164.
The petition is dismissed for failure to comply with the rules of this Court requiring such petition to be presented on transcript paper.
Petition dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Duckett v. State
...So ordered. Stovall v. Stovall, Ala.Sup., 57 So.2d 641; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32......
-
Hochman v. State, 1 Div. 700
...357; Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 116, 57 So.2d 641; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 ......
-
Accardo v. State, 7 Div. 414
...251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Bray v. State, 257 Ala. 111, 57 So.2d 555; Williams v. State, 258 Ala. 638, 64 So.2d 617; Conley v. State, 265 Ala. 450, ......
-
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Korneghy
...357; Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 116, 57 So.2d 641; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 ......