Maddox v. State
Decision Date | 13 January 1995 |
Parties | Ex parte State of Alabama. (Re Jimmy Lee MADDOX v. STATE). 1921345. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Jimmy Lee Maddox, pro se.
James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Cecil G. Brendle, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Jimmy Lee Maddox was convicted in 1972 of forgery in the first degree. He filed a post-conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus and/or writ of error coram nobis 21 years after his conviction. The Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the case to the circuit court with directions to return the petition to Maddox so that he could file it in the court of original conviction, as required by Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P. See Maddox v. State, 662 So.2d 914 (Ala.Crim.App.1993).
Judge Bowen dissented from the majority opinion, stating:
We granted the State's petition for certiorari review to address the State's contention that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred "in holding that a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. State
...set out in §§ 15-21-1 through -34. See Drayton v. State, 600 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Crim.App.1992), overruled on other grounds, Maddox v. State, 662 So.2d 915 (Ala.1995); Rule 32.4. Thus, the law on habeas corpus petitions is Although § 15-21-4, Ala.Code 1975, provides that a petition for a writ o......
-
Ex parte Boykins
...of custody classification. See Drayton v. State, 600 So.2d 1088, 1090 (Ala.Crim.App.1992), overruled on other grounds, Maddox v. State, 662 So.2d 915 (Ala.1995). The application of that rule to Deramus's situation was perfectly appropriate because by being physically restrained from partici......
-
Knight v. State
...State, 600 So.2d 1088 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992). However, in 1995, the Alabama Supreme Court overruled that line of cases in Maddox v. State, 662 So.2d 915 (Ala. 1995), which we quote in its entirety:"Jimmy Lee Maddox was convicted in 1972 of forgery in the first degree. He filed a post-convic......
-
Bagley v. State
...him the opportunity to file his petition using the proper Rule 32 form and then to reconsider the petition. However, in Maddox v. State, 662 So.2d 915 (Ala.1995), the Alabama Supreme Court explained:" ‘Just as Rule 32.7(d) (allowing summary dismissal of a petition) overrides, in some cases,......