Madenwald v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A., CASE NO. 4:13-CV-136

• Decision Date: 18 July 2014
• Docket Number: CASE NO. 4:13-CV-136
• Parties: MARK L. MADENWALD and ALMEDA F. MADENWALD, Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR WAMU MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATE FOR WMALT SERIES 2007-OA3 TRUST, and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.
• Court: U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas

MARK L. MADENWALD and ALMEDA F. MADENWALD, Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,AS TRUSTEE FOR WAMU MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATEFOR WMALT SERIES 2007-OA3 TRUST, and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.

CASE NO. 4:13-CV-136

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

So ORDERED: July 18, 2014

**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**

Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.On May 14, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment[Doc. #37] be granted [Doc. #46].On May 23, 2014, Plaintiffs filed an opposed motion to enlarge time to respond to the report and recommendation [Doc. #47].On May 28, 2014, the court granted the Plaintiffs' request and gave Plaintiffs until June 4, 2014, to file their objections.On June 5, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their Objection to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. #49].After the Clerk notified Plaintiffs that the document had been filed

Page 2

under the wrong event, Plaintiffs refill the objections on June 6, 2014[Doc. #50].On June 9, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to strike the objections as untimely.Plaintiffs filed no response to the motion to strike nor did they request that the court consider the late objections.The objections were filed late and will not...