Madura v. Full Spectrum Lending, Inc., SC06-999.

• Court: Florida Supreme Court
• Writing for the Court: Per Curiam
• Citation: Madura v. Full Spectrum Lending, Inc., 972 So.2d 169 (Fla. 2007)
• Decision Date: 06 December 2007
• Docket Number: No. SC06-999.,SC06-999.
• Parties: Andrzej MADURA, Petitioner, v. FULL SPECTRUM LENDING, INC., et al., Respondents.

972 So.2d 169

Andrzej MADURA, Petitioner, v. FULL SPECTRUM LENDING, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. SC06-999.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 6, 2007.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict, Second District — Case No. 2D06-915 (Manatee County).

Andrzej Madura, pro se, Bradenton, FL, for Petitioner.

William P. Heller and Kimberly A. Leary of Akerman Senterfitt, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the unpublished order of the Second District Court of Appeal dismissing Madura's petition for writ of certiorari in Madura v. Full Spectrum Lending, Inc., 926 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Review was initially granted based on alleged express and direct conflict with Hall v. Wojechowski, 312 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion to discharge jurisdiction in this cause. Accordingly, jurisdiction is discharged and this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

LEWIS, C.J., dissents.