Magana-Pizano v. I.N.S., MAGANA-PIZAN
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Citation | 159 F.3d 1217 |
| Docket Number | MAGANA-PIZAN,Nos. 97-15678,97-70384,P |
| Parties | 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8405, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,671 Danieletitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Decision Date | 13 November 1998 |
Page 1217
D.A.R. 11,671
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.
Ninth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding and a Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. INS No. A35-822-607. D.C. No. CV 97-00619 SMM.
Before: GOODWIN and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, PREGERSON, * District Judge.
It is ordered that the opinion filed on September 1, 1998, be amended to delete the paragraph at page 5, as reported in 152 F.3d 1213 at 1215, which states:
Page 1218
Petitions for review filed between the passage of IIRIRA on September 30, 1996, and IIRIRA's general effective date of April 1, 1997, are governed by interim transitional rules. See IIRIRA § 309(c); Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997).
In lieu thereof, the following language is hereby substituted:
Immigration proceedings initiated by the INS before IIRIRA's general effective date of April 1, 1997, in which a final deportation or exclusion order was filed after October 30, 1996, are governed by interim transitional rules. See IIRIRA § 309(c); Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997).
---------------
* The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
LaGuerre v. Reno, s. 98-1954
...157 F.3d 106, 122 (2d Cir.1998); Goncalves v. Reno, 144 F.3d 110, 118-23 (1st Cir.1998); Magana-Pizano v. INS, 152 F.3d 1213, amended, 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir.1998) (per curiam). These courts point out that Congress did not amend the basic federal habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241, whi......
-
Naidoo v. I.N.S., 98-CV-1045.
...L.Ed.2d 208 (1999); Henderson v. INS, 157 F.3d 106 (2d Cir.1998); Magana-Pizano v. INS, 152 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir.1998), opinion amended by 159 F.3d 1217, cert. granted, judgment vacated by Magana-Pizano v. INS, 525 U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 1137, 143 L.Ed.2d 206 (1999) and cert. granted, judgment v......
-
Maldonado v. Fasano
...aliens who could seek direct review in the court of appeals), and Magana-Pizano v. INS, 152 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir.1998), amended 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir.1998) (holding that INA § 242(g), as interpreted by Hose and applied to criminal aliens precluded from direct judicial review to court of appe......
-
Berlanga v. Reno, Civ.A. H-98-2557.
...appeals, rather than by § 2241 habeas in the district courts."); Magana-Pizano v. INS, 152 F.3d 1213, 1216-18 (9th Cir. 1998), amended, 159 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 1998) (per curiam), vacated, ___ U.S. ___, 119 S.Ct. 1137, 143 L.Ed.2d 206 (1999) (in light of Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimin......