Mahan v. Mahan

CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtSCHEB
CitationMahan v. Mahan, 415 So.2d 146 (Fla. App. 1982)
Decision Date16 June 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81-1457,81-1457
PartiesRobert MAHAN, Appellant, v. Ida M. MAHAN, Appellee.

Stephen C. Watson of Hahn, Brethitt, Roberts & Watson, P. A., Lakeland, for appellant.

C. Ray McDaniel and Marshall G. Slaughter, Bartow, for appellee.

SCHEB, Chief Judge.

We reject the husband's arguments that the trial court erred in awarding the wife permanent alimony, the husband's interest in the marital home, and attorney's fees. These awards are all supported by substantial, competent evidence and are within the trial court's discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We agree, however, with the husband's contention that the trial court erred in requiring him to maintain a policy of life insurance on his life with the wife as a named beneficiary. Eagan v. Eagan, 392 So.2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Watterson v. Watterson, 353 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Blass v. Blass, 316 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Perkins v. Perkins, 310 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). See also, O'Malley v. Pan American Bank, 384 So.2d 1258 (Fla.1980), for the proposition that the obligation to pay alimony ceases upon the death of the obligated party.

Accordingly, we strike from the final judgment of dissolution paragraph 11, which requires the husband to maintain a policy of insurance on his life with his wife as beneficiary. Otherwise, we affirm the judgment.

We provisionally grant the wife's motion for attorney's fees for services of her counsel on appeal in accordance with the rationale of Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). We remand to the trial court to make a determination of the amount of a reasonable fee for such services and the portion thereof that the husband should be...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Gregg v. Gregg
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 18, 1985
    ...on his life for the benefit of the wife, any provision in a dissolution judgment requiring such is improper. 7 See Mahan v. Mahan, 415 So.2d 146 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 424 So.2d 762 (Fla.1982); Blais v. Blais, 410 So.2d 1365 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Eagan v. Eagan, 392 So.2d 988 (Fla. 5t......
  • Moore v. Moore
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 10, 1989
    ...O'Malley v. Pan American Bank of Orlando, 384 So.2d 1258 (Fla.1980); Gregg v. Gregg, 474 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Mahan v. Mahan, 415 So.2d 146 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 424 So.2d 762 (Fla.1982); Eagan v. Eagan, 392 So.2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). No such agreement exists in this Howe......
  • McClung v. McClung
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 22, 1985
    ...primary beneficiary on the life insurance policies. If the intent was to award post mortem alimony, the award was invalid. Mahan v. Mahan, 415 So.2d 146 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition for review denied, 424 So.2d 762 (Fla.1982); Putman v. Putman, 154 So.2d 717 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Cf. Aldrich v. Al......
  • DiPrima v. DiPrima, 82-448
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 7, 1983
    ...as lump sum alimony or "equitable distribution." Canakaris. See also White v. White, 429 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Mahan v. Mahan, 415 So.2d 146 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Kirchman v. Kirchman, 389 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). It was also to some extent influenced by the transfer of the wif......
  • Get Started for Free