Mahoney v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Civ. No. 1028-L.

Decision Date22 September 1966
Docket NumberCiv. No. 1028-L.
PartiesLillian B. MAHONEY, Plaintiff, v. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Nebraska

Reller & McArthur, Lincoln, Neb., for plaintiff.

Flavel A. Wright, of Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson, Oldfather & Thompson, Lincoln, Neb., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Filing # 4 herein.

The complaint asserts that this Court's jurisdiction over the action is based on diversity of citizenship between plaintiff and defendant. In support of the assertion plaintiff alleges that she is a citizen of the State of Nebraska and that defendant is an Iowa corporation with its principal place of business in a state other than Nebraska. The defendant contends that the requisite diversity is lacking because its principal place of business is located in Nebraska.

Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332c provides:

"For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business * * *."

The defendant, Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, is engaged in the business of supplying communications services in the states of Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and Minnesota.

The affidavits and answers to interrogatories submitted to this Court for and against the motion to dismiss reveal the following facts concerning the defendant. The corporation's $1,359,147,587.00 of undepreciated assets are distributed among the five states in the following manner: Minnesota—$569,787,293.00; Iowa—$384,295,942.00; Nebraska—$194,966,300.00; South Dakota —$115,265,078.00; North Dakota—$94,832,974.00. The Corporation's $407,848,603.00 gross income for the year ending December 31, 1965 came from: Minnesota—$171,853,592.00; Iowa— $118,971,114.00; Nebraska—$55,660,051.00; South Dakota—$32,873,802.00; and North Dakota—$28,490,044.00. The defendant had a net profit for the same year of $75,520,871.00. Of this amount $31,570,424.00 was derived from operations in Minnesota, $22,114,541.00, from Iowa, $10,810,902.00, from Nebraska, $5,708,425.00, from South Dakota, and $5,316,579.00 from North Dakota. Similar proportions exist among the five states as to the number of telephone service units, telephone operators, total miles of telephone wires, motor vehicles, and total employees. In each case both Minnesota and Iowa have a significantly greater portion of the corporation's total than does Nebraska, and in the same respect Nebraska has a greater portion than North and South Dakota. Each of the five states has regional offices from which operations in that state are directed. Although the day to day business of the company is handled by the regional offices, the Omaha office directs the methods, procedures, and standards of operation in detailed "Practices". These "Practices" originate at the Omaha office and provide the regional offices with rules for the day to day operations of the business. All major policy decisions are made in Omaha, Nebraska, at the general headquarters of the defendant with the exception of when the Board of Directors of the corporation meet in some other state. The offices of the President, Vice President-Operations, Secretary and Treasurer Vice President and Comptroller, and six other Vice Presidents are located in Omaha. These officers direct, supervise, or control: the company advertising program, the corporate records, union negotiations and contracts, contracts with the armed services, agreements with the Federal Communications Commission,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Hanna v. Fleetguard, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • August 23, 1995
    ...the public, the largest number of employees, the greatest assets, and derives most of its income. See Mahoney v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 258 F.Supp. 500, 502 (D.Neb.1966), aff'd, 377 F.2d 549 (8th Cir.1967) (favoring the center of corporate activity test); Tubbs v. Southwestern Bel......
  • Quality Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. City of Spencer
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of West Virginia
    • November 2, 1995
    ...with the public, the largest number of employees, the greatest assets, and derives most of its income. See Mahoney v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 258 F.Supp. 500, 502 (D.Neb.1966), aff'd, 377 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1967) (favoring the center of corporate activity test); Tubbs v. Southwestern Be......
  • DeKalb County v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Company
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • October 30, 1972
    ...Southern Bell Tel. and Tel. Co., 209 F.Supp. 921 (M.D.Ga.1962); to be decided on a case by case basis. e.g., Mahoney v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 258 F.Supp. 500 (D.C.Neb.1966), aff'd 377 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1967); see also Herschel v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., supra; Scot Typewriter Co. v. ......
  • ASSOCIATED PETRO. PROD. v. Treco 3 Rivers Energy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • August 19, 1988
    ...case and at least suggest that the most appropriate test to employ is the "total activities" test. See Mahoney v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 258 F.Supp. 500 (D.Neb.1966), aff'd, 377 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1967) (noting that the split of authority as to which test to employ is largely ling......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT