Makowski v. Governor

Decision Date05 July 2013
Docket NumberDocket No. 146867.,COA No. 307402.
Citation494 Mich. 876,832 N.W.2d 392
PartiesMatthew MAKOWSKI, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. GOVERNOR and Secretary of State, Defendants–Appellees.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Prior report: 299 Mich.App. 166, 829 N.W.2d 291.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) what authority, if any, the courts of this State have to review actions taken by the Governor under the authority conferred by 1963 Const, Art V, § 14; (2) how the separation of powers doctrine and the principle of nonjusticiable political questions relate to that constitutional authority; (3) whether the commutation of the plaintiff's sentence was completed before the Governor took steps to revoke it and whether the Court has the authority to address this question; (4) whether the power to grant clemency under the cited constitutional provision also includes the power to rescind, revoke or otherwise overturn a decision to grant clemency; and (5) to the extent the courts have the authority to address the question, whether the Governor in this case exceeded the authority granted by the constitution by revoking the commutation of sentence given to the plaintiff after it was signed by the Governor, sealed by and filed with the Secretary of State, and delivered to the Michigan Department of Corrections.

McCORMACK, J., not participating because of her prior involvement in this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • In re Request for Advisory Op. Regarding Constitutionality of 2012 Pa 348
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 5, 2013
    ... ... On order of the Court, the Solicitor General's brief having been received, the request by the Governor for an advisory opinion on the constitutionality of 2012 PA 348 and 2012 PA 349 is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT