Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.
Decision Date | 06 September 2019 |
Docket Number | 17-10180-NMG,Civil Action No. 16-12538-NMG, 17-10142-NMG, 17-10316-NMG, DocketNumber : consolidated with: 16-12651-NMG, 17-10586-NMG, 17-10598-NMG |
Citation | 404 F.Supp.3d 404 |
Parties | MALDEN TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Rasier, LLC, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
Christopher G. Timson, Law Offices of Christopher G. Timson, PC, Norwood, MA, Daniel J. McGonagle, Paul J. Hayes, Thomas C. O'Konski, Walter B. Prince, Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Edward F. Haber, Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP, Joseph S. Sano, Prince, Lobel Glovsky & Tye LLP, Boston, MA, Brendan R. Pitts, Colucci, Colucci, Marcus & Flavin, P.C., Milton, MA, for Plaintiffs.
Beatriz Mejia, Lauren Pomeroy, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA, John C. Dwyer, Pro Hac Vice, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Karen L. Dunn, Pro Hac Vice, Kristin Bender, Pro Hac Vice, Meryl Conant Governski, Pro Hac Vice, Stacey K. Grigsby, Pro Hac Vice, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Washington, DC, Michael Sheetz, Adam S. Gershenson, Julianne Landsvik, Luke T. Cadigan, Michael E. Welsh, Timothy W. Cook, Bryan Koch, Pro Hac Vice, Cooley LLP, Boston, MA, David A. Barrett, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, NY, Meredith Dearborn, Pro Hac Vice, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Oakland, CA, Christopher G. Timson, Law Offices of Christopher G. Timson, PC, Norwood, MA, for Defendants.
Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge This case involves a suit by the Anoush plaintiffs (taxi medallion holders in the Greater Boston) who allege that Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC (collectively "Uber" or "defendants") competed unfairly in the on-demand, ride-hail Boston transportation market in violation of M.G.L. Chapter 93A, § 11 and Massachusetts common law.1
The Court presided over a seven-day bench trial in late July, 2019, and early August, 2019, and now publishes its findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Montoya v. CRST Expedited, Inc.
... ... at 5; see also Julian v. Swift Transp. Co. , 360 F. Supp. 3d 932, 942 (D. Ariz. 2018) (noting that internal ... ...
-
Anoush Cab, Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc.
...after considering the evidence presented at the bench trial, in a thorough Memorandum of Decision ("Decision"), Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc., 404 F. Supp. 3d 404 (D. Mass. 2019) (" Malden III").The Anoush plaintiffs-appellants ("plaintiffs") are thirty-four corporations in the ......
-
Zotbelle, Inc. v. Kryolan Corp.
...suffered and the defendants' unfair or deceptive method, act or practice. Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc., No. 16-cv-12538-NMG, 404 F.Supp.3d 404, 417–18, 2019 WL 4247988, at *9 (D. Mass. Sept. 6, 2019) (citing Auto Flat Car Crushers, Inc. v. Hanover Ins. Co., 469 Mass. 813, 17 N.......
-
Conformis, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc.
...and "the equities between the parties, including what both parties knew or should have known." Malden Transp., Inc. v. Uber Techs., Inc., 404 F. Supp. 3d 404, 419 (D. Mass. 2019) (citing Auto Flat Car Crushers, Inc. v. Hanover Ins. Co., 469 Mass. 813, 820, 17 N.E.3d1066 (2014)). Conformis' ......