Maldonado v. Mun.Ity Of Barceloneta, Civil No. 07-1992 (JAG).
| Decision Date | 19 January 2010 |
| Docket Number | Civil No. 07-1992 (JAG). |
| Citation | 682 F.Supp.2d 109 |
| Parties | Madeline MALDONADO, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. MUNICIPALITY OF BARCELONETA, et al., Defendant(s). |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Maria S. Kortright-Soler, M.S. Kort-right Soler Law Office, San Juan, PR, Pedro R. Vazquez, III, Pedro R. Vazquez Law Office, Guaynabo, PR, for Plaintiffs.
Luis F. Colon, Colon Gonzalez Law Office, Robert Freedman, Luis F. Colon-Conde, C. Conde & Mirandes, Miguel A. Pereira, Luis F Colon & Associates, Wan-dymar Burgos-Vargas, P.R. Department of Justice, Guillermo A. Macari-Grillo, Ma-cari Law Office, Jose J. Gueits-Ortiz, Department of Justice of Puerto Rico, Robert Millan, Millan Law Office, Enrique Velez-Rodriguez, Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, Miriam Ramos Grateroles, San Juan, PR, Marcos Valls-Sanchez, Marcos Vails Sanchez, Trujillo Alto, PR, for Defendants.
The twenty-seven named plaintiff families in the case at bar, all residents of three public housing complexes located in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (collectively "Plaintiffs"), bring a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 against Defendants asserting violations of their rights under the United States Constitution. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the precipitous seizure and cruel killings of their pet cats and dogs by Defendants violated their Fourth Amendment rights to be free from the unreasonable seizure of their "effects," and their Fourteenth Amendment substantive and procedural due process rights. Plaintiffs also proffered claims under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and supplemental law claims under the laws and Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Plaintiffs are seeking compensatory and punitive damages, costs, attorney's fees, declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and the value of their pets. (See Docket No. 36).
Plaintiffs' claims under the Fifth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1985 against Defendants the Municipality of Barceloneta ("the Municipality"), Mayor Luis Fon-tanes ("the Mayor"), Elsa Perez ("Perez"), and the conjugal partnership Fontanes-Perez were dismissed by this Court. (Docket No. 91). Furthermore, the First Circuit ordered the dismissal of Plaintiffs' substantive due process claims under the Fourteenth Amendment. (Docket No. 233). Maldonado v. Fontanes, 568 F.3d 263, 271 (1st Cir.2009).
Defendants the Mayor, the Municipality ("Defendants I"), Leonides Gonzalez, Sylvia Riquelme, Esther Ruiz, Ahmid Molina Morales and Edgardo Santiago ("Defendants II") (collectively "Defendants") move for summary judgment. (Docket Nos. 182 and 197). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' motions.
The parties summary judgment pleadings reveal the following uncontested material facts. All of the Plaintiffs' households are located in three public housing developments in the Municipality of Barceloneta. (Docket No. 182-2 at 1, ¶ 1 & Docket No. 214-2 at 1-2, ¶1). Of the 85 Plaintiffs, 56 are minor children. (Docket No. 182-2 at 1, ¶2 & Docket No. 214-2 at 2, ¶ 2). All of the adult Plaintiffs voluntarily entered into a lease with the responsible public housing authority. (Docket No. 182-2 at 1, ¶ 3 & Docket No. 214-2 at 2, ¶3). The leases stated that the tenants agreed to abide by the Admission and Continued Occupancy Policies of the Public Housing Authority ("PHA"). (Docket No. 182-2 at 1, ¶4 & Docket No. 214-2 at 2, ¶4).
On October 1, 1999, the United States Congress approved 42 U.S.C. § 1437z-3, a public health and welfare law that allowed public housing residents to own and have in their dwelling one or more household pets. (Docket No. 214-2 at 38, ¶1 & Docket No. 230-2 at 3, ¶4). Title 24 C.F.R. § 960.707 allows a public housing resident to own one or more common household pet or have one or more household pet present in the dwelling of such resident, subject to reasonable requirements of PHA. (Docket No. 214-2 at 38, ¶ 2 & Docket No. 230-2 at 3, ¶4). In the year 2000, the Municipality of Barceloneta passed Ordinance No. 33, which did not allow residents to have pets in urbanizations, the town center, and in housing developments. (Docket No. 214-2 at 38, ¶3 & Docket No. 230-2 at 3, ¶4).
From 2003 to 2006, the Puerto Rico Public Housing Authority ("PRPHA") submitted to the United States Department and Housing Development ("HUD") an Annual Plan, and their Five Year Plan, which contained the policies under which they work. (Docket No. 214-2 at 39, ¶ 4 & Docket No. 230-2 at 3, ¶ 4). The Annual Plan is the document that the PHA submits to HUD under 24 C.F.R. § 903.4. (Docket No. 214-2 at 39, ¶ 5 & Docket No. 230-2 at 3, ¶ 4). The 2007 Annual Plan and the Five Year Plan was approved by HUD on June 25, 2007, and is in effect as of July 1, 2007. (Docket No. 214-2 at 39, ¶ 6 & Docket No. 230-2 at 3, ¶ 5). In 2007, PRPHA approved a pet policy consistent with the federal laws and regulations that allowed public housing residents to have pets. (Docket No. 214-2 at 39, ¶ 7 & Docket No. 230-2 at 3, ¶5). PRPHA's policy (hereinafter referred to as the "2007 Pet Policy") provided that "[p]et ownership shall be limited to common household pets, which shall be defined to include only dogs, cats, caged birds, commonly kept as pets, tropical fish, frogs, iguanas and tur tles kept in aquariums, other small caged animals, and no other species of animal; the pets must be registered with PRPHA or Management Agents." (Docket No. 214-13, Exh. 7 at 5 ¶ C). In September 2007, the PRPHA provided training to the Municipalities, including the Municipality of Barceloneta, on the management of public housing under federal laws and regulations. (Docket No. 214-2 at 39, ¶9 & Docket No. 230-2 at 4, ¶ 3).
On October 1, 2007, the Municipality of Barceloneta began to manage the three public housing complexes where Plaintiffs reside. (Docket No. 214-2 at 44, ¶24 & Docket No. 230-2 at 5, ¶ 5). In doing so, the Municipality of Barceloneta agreed to comply with the PRPHA's formally adopted policies for grievance procedures and hearings (formal or informal) and any other required procedure in compliance with 24 C.F.R. part 966, subpart B and any other federal or state regulation. (Docket No. 214-2 at 40, ¶ 11; Docket No. 214-16, Exh. 10A at 11-12 ¶8.4 & Docket No. 230-2 at 4, ¶ 4). On October 2, 2007, the Municipality of Barceloneta, through the administrators of each public housing development, drafted a letter notifying residents of the public housing developments that they could not have pets in their residences and that their lease contracts could be canceled if they did not comply with the prohibition. (Docket No. 214-2 at 44, ¶ 25; Docket No. 214-31, Exh. 20 & Docket No. 230-2 at 5, ¶ 5). The letter was signed by the administrators on October 3, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as "the letter"). (Docket No. 214-2 at 44, ¶26; Docket No. 214-31, Exh. 20 & Docket No. 230-2 at 6, ¶ 2).
On October 5, 2007, the Municipality of Barceloneta issued a purchase order to Animal Control Services ("ACS") to collect up to 50 animals. (Docket No. 214-2 at 44, ¶ 28 & Docket No. 230-2 at 6, ¶4). From that same day until October 7, the administrators personally delivered the letter to the residents. The letter, however, did not state that officials would enter the housing developments on any date in particular to enforce the prohibition against owning pets. (Docket No. 214-2 at 44, ¶ 27 & Docket No. 230-2 at 6, ¶ 3). On October 8, 2007, the Mayor, along with employees from both the Municipality and ACS, went into each of the public housing communities in order to execute an operation for the pick up of the pets owned by the public housing residents. (Docket No. 214-2 at 45, ¶31; Docket No. 230-2 at 7, ¶ 1 & Docket No. 239-3, Exh. 27 at 2-3).
Municipal employees asked residents whether they had any pets that needed to be turned over as required by the purported pet policy. (Docket No. 239-2, Exh. 23 at 2). About 50 to 80 animals were seized from the public housing complexes. (Docket No. 214-24, Exh. 30). The animals were injected with a yellowish-green color liquid, after which some of the animals became dazed while others did not move. (Docket No. 214-2 at 49, ¶ 51). All the animals picked up, were put in one van that contained only six to eight plastic crates. (Docket No. 214-2 at 48, ¶48). Some of the animals picked up were beaten against the van. (Docket No. 214-2 at 58, ¶122).
Thereafter, some of the pets picked up were thrown from a bridge known as "Pa-seo del Indio." (Docket No. 239-4, Exh. 28 at 2; Docket No. 214-37, Exh. 26 at 15 & 214-2 at 70 ¶ 205). At the bottom of the "Paseo del Indio" Bridge there were many dead dogs and broken tree limbs scattered around. (Docket No. 214-2 at 70, 1f1f 206 and 207). Also, a dog was found hanging from a tree. (Docket No. 214-2 at 85, ¶ 317; Docket No. 238-6, Exh. 14 at 2).
On October 10, 2007, another operation took place in which pets in possession of public housing residents were taken. (Docket No. 182, Exh. 38 at 48-9). The animals underneath the "Paseo del Indio" Bridge were buried on October 12, 2007. (Docket No. 214-2 at 86, ¶321; Docket No. 238-6, Exh. 14 at 3).
On October 17, 2007, the Municipality of Barceloneta fully relinquished its administrative duties to operate the public housing developments. (Docket No. 182-2 at 8, ¶45 & Docket No. 214-2 at 37, ¶45). Since October 17, 2007, the public housing facilities have not been administered by the Municipality of Barceloneta. (Docket No. 182-2 at 9, ¶46 & Docket No. 214-2 at 38, 1146).
On May 29, 2009, Defendants I filed a motion for summary judgment....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Chopmist Hill Fire Dep't v. Town of Scituate
...deprivations of their constitutional rights, including the right to be free from unreasonable seizures. Maldonado v. Municipality of Barceloneta, 682 F.Supp.2d 109 (D.P.R.2010). A corporation is entitled to some protection against unreasonable search and seizures. G.M. Leasing Corp. v. Unit......
-
Chopmist Hill Fire Dep't v. Town Of Scituate, C.A. No. 09-531-ML
...deprivations of their constitutional rights, including the right to be free from unreasonable seizures. Maldonado v. Municipality of Barceloneta. 682 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D.P.R. 2010). A corporation is entitled to some protection against unreasonable search and seizures. G.M. Leasing Corp. v. U......
-
Remus-Milán v. Irizarry-Pagán
...give rise to plausible claims of entitlement to relief against the Municipality. See, Maldonado v. Municipality of Barceloneta, 682 F.Supp.2d 109, 159 (D.P.R.2010) (mayor's actions constituted the official policy of the municipality; therefore, the municipality may be held liable under Sect......